National security

plays a big part in our national

services and products to these government entities. These investigations are conducted to determine the suitability of the subject of the investigation to hold a security clearance for a position impacting our national security. Many of the individuals hired by the aforementioned organizations are placed in positions which require a security clearance. Based on the type of clearance, the person has access to information that is crucial to implementation of the missions of US government entities and

National Security is More Important than Human Rights The conception of human rights and freedoms is the cornerstone of American traditions, law and the indicator of democracy. The approach of prevailing interest in personal privacy, property privacy and non-interference of state authorities in private affairs is the basic ground for modern organization of American society. For centuries the courts have been standing safeguards of protection of persons against unreasonable intrusion of the State

refugees is more important than national security. The articles, “That Time the United States Happily Airlifted Thousands of Muslim Refugees out of Europe”, “Anne Frank and her Family Denied Entry to the US”, “Japanese American Relocation”, “Remembering the Victims of the San Bernardino Attack”,” 2015 Paris Terror Attack Fast Facts”, and "George Takei: They interned my family. Don't let them do it to Muslims” all prove one thing. They all prove that national security should take precedence over upholding

ensures our privilege of security and the privilege to be free from unreasonable search and seizures. But to what degree is unreasonable? I believe that these rights might be misinterpreted depending on the circumstance that is happening. In the event that something is to affect the health and happiness of the common people, in other words, national security. At that point I do believe these rights should to be put on delay for the occasion. I feel that national security is more imperative than protection

A NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT: CYBERCRIME Monika Sharma1 and Michael Losavio2 1Department of Computer Science and Computer Engineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 2Department of Justice Administration, Department of Computer Science and Computer Engineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY. m0shar17@louisville.edu, Michael.Losavio@louisville.edu ABSTRACT Cyberspace which is an offshoot of the development of computer and digital communication technologies, has in recent

not clarified actions involving mainly the use of data collection, leaded the NSA, the National Security Agency of United States of America whose was founded in 1952 for the former United States President Harry S. Truman, one of the greatest questions marks in America’s society at 21st Century. However, limitless efforts made against national and foreign terrorist plots, cyber technology alongside of security advances, noticeable actions also a huge support from the government, created a notable

terrorism rates in America, the optimal solution thus far is enhancing security throughout the nation. By doing so, policies, procedures, and protocols would be amended for the sole purpose of protecting the country. Such alterations should be made because it prevents crime in a timely, reliable, and successful manner, whilst preserving the fundamental rights of all United States Citizens. In light of the controversy over national security versus digital privacy, the government should partake in international

information security and how to protect it. From the laws and regulations to who is ultimately responsible and the one to assume responsibility when breaches take place. Whether it is the government or the private sector, someone has to take charge because we all have a vested interest in protecting our families, our businesses and our nation’s security in cyberspace. In this paper I researched into what government intervention is in the works when it comes to cybersecurity and protecting national security

argument because they say that National Security Letters are limited and pose very little threat to civilian’s privacy but we say that National Security Letters are an abuse of power that enables needless mass government surveillance, which violates privacy and at the same time, it threatens and harms democracy. National Security Letters are nothing short of an abuse of power. We think this because the FBI have been systematically abusing the power that the National Security Letters hold by obtaining