.NET Framework

Financial decision making Contents Introduction: 1 Task: 1 1 (a) Ratio analysis on the basis of AstraZeneca Annual Report and Form 20-F Information 2012: 1 (b) Business structure and financial structure (comparison and relative advantages of the chosen organization) 5 (c) Compare and comment on the finances of business: 7 (d)Recommend potential investor for the investment decision: 8 (e)All possible Sources of finance for 500000 and best source 8 (f) Management of working capital: 10 Task

Capital Budgeting Case Theresa Cruz, Jesika Watson, Sophina Lane QRB/501 March 30, 2015 Melinda Gregg Capital Budgeting Case Analyzing the Results In the two capital budgeting cases corporations (A and B) have different revenues values and expenses as well as variable depreciation expenses, tax rates and discount rates. The members of our team had to compute both corporate cases NVP, IRR, PI, Payback Period, DPP, and project a 5-year income statement and cash flow in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet

Corporate Finance Tute-2 1. You are contemplating buying a pension policy. Your financial advisor tells you that to buy the pension policy, you have to pay (or contribute to) the pension fund an amount that is constant in real terms every year, starting 1 year from now, for the next 30 years (i.e. until and including the year 2039). In return, the pension fund provider shall pay an annual pension to you for the subsequent 30 years (i.e. starting in the year 2040) that is constant in real terms

depending on the estimate. 4. We estimated the project net present value to be -$19,125,000 without tweaking any of the financial assumptions in the capital request form. So to make the net present value positive we would have to change something. We first started by adding 10% to the utilization for every year. This alone didn’t make a huge difference so we had to additionally lower the hourly wage to $18.19/hr. This gave us a net present value of about $35,000. This seems unreasonable or at

Solution to Case 03 Cash Flow Analysis The Lazy Mower: Is it really worth it? Questions: 1. Prepare a Pro Forma Statement showing the annual cash flows resulting from the Lazy Mower project. (See table on next page) | |0 |1 | |Base | $ 46,162,736.36 |60.806% | |Pessimistic | $ 36,143,876.79 |51.733% | |Optimistic | $ 60

Case 70 Computer Concepts/CompuTech Merger Analysis QUESTIONS Question 1 Several factors have been proposed as providing a rationale for mergers. Among the more prominent ones are (1) tax considerations, (2) diversification, (3) control, (4) purchase of assets below replacement cost, and (5) synergy. From the standpoint of society, which of these reasons are justifiable? Which are not? Why is such a question relevant to a company like CompuTech, which is considering a specific acquisition

 Rank the projects using various measures of investment attractiveness. Do all the measures rank the projects identically? Why or why not? Which criterion is the best? Method 1 &2: Discounted & Conventional Payback Period Payback Period = Net Investment / Annual Returns  Initial Investment = 1,700,000.00 Discounted Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 Cash InFlow (THB) Balance (THB) 598,970.74 1,101,029.26 592,405.24 508,624.02 558,615.89 0.00 527,129.08 0.00 520,260.94 0.00 512,694.95 0.00 Total Years 1

BUSN 278 Budgeting and Forecasting Entire Course https://homeworklance.com/downloads/busn-278-budgeting-and-forecasting-entire-course/ BUSN 278 Budgeting and Forecasting Entire Course BUSN278 Week 1 Section 1.0 Executive Summary (Draft) BUSN 278 Week 2 Section 2.0 Sales Forecast (Draft) BUSN278 Week 3 Section 3.0 Capital Expenditure Budget (Draft) BUSN278 Week 4 Section 4.0 Investment Analysis (Draft) BUSN278 Week 5 Section 5.1 Pro Forma Income Statement (Draft) BUSN278 Week 6 Section

Your Company Name Budget Proposal For [Enter Years Here] BUSN-278 [Term] Professor[name] DeVry University ------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents Section | Title | Subsection | Title | Page Number | 1.0 | Executive summary | | | | 2.0 | Sales Forecast | | | | | | 2.1 | Sales Forecast | | | | 2.2 | Methods and Assumptions | | 3.0 | Capital Expenditure Budget | | | | 4.0 | Investment Analysis | | | | | | 4.1 | Cash flows

11.5% to 16.0%. After auditing the financial models, it is concluded that the static net present value of the upgrade is -£6.35 million using a discount rate of 10% and an expected inflation rate of 3% annually. The Rotterdam upgrade contains an option to switch to the speculated German technology being available in five years. The current value of the option is zero as it is deeply out-of-the-money. The total net present value of the upgrade is -£6.35 million. The incremental earnings per share of