Nonviolent

physical violence, instead, it was due to the strategic use of nonviolent action. Notable revolutions such as the Civil Rights Movement, Apartheid, and the Dandi Satyagraha (The Salt March) employed a variety of nonviolent tactics that amassed many supporters and ultimately achieved their goals. Thus, it is logical enough to say that nonviolent resistance is effective and has the ability to force a social change. In fact, nonviolent action is a far better method for social change than violent works

have no fear in holding their signs high and proud. To some violence seems like the only answer, but the results are not as rewarding nor as long lasting. Although some may believe violence is the only answer they are turning a blind eye because nonviolent protests are more successful, get more government support, and gather more civilians around the cause. To begin with, the common misconception is that you can’t be heard on your issue unless you’re being violent. People get to the point where they

right. Creating a nonviolent resistance is the most concrete way to persuade the opposing side to listen to the issue at hand. Society can only benefit from civil disobedience, for it is healthy to have a dialogue between the government and its people. The positive influence of a dialogue between the government and its people is a must, however more times than not, in recent months, it seems that the dialogue has been used with profanity rather than etiquette. Performing nonviolent protest brings respect

social and the political fabrics of human endeavors. Writing on nonviolence resistance, Ravinda Kumar asserts that nonviolent noncooperation is a “powerful, noble, exemplary and effective method or means to accord equal justice and freedom” To Kumar, the Gandhian method of nonviolent action concerns itself with all people, valuable, effective and benevolent. Kumar argues that nonviolent actions are incorporated in them

conclusion, but not for all of them. With nonviolent protest our words are used as our weapons. We speak with the freedom of the first amendment, the right to civil disobedience and the satisfaction that we solved our issues in a justifiable manner. All around the globe we crave the immediate satisfaction of emotional rebellion regardless of the impact, which is why nonviolent protest is more effective than violent protest. In the world today, we see both nonviolent and violent protester use the act of

Nonviolent noncooperation is the most effective way to achieve independence. Through nonviolent acts, people suffer less casualties, a positive behavior towards humankind is publicized and it is a easier and more joinable movement. All throughout history there have been many protests or acts of noncooperation that successfully lead to a step closer towards independence. It is safe, encouraging, and persuasive. First, people suffer less casualties in a nonviolent revolution. In conflicting situations

Part One: In the letter from the eight Alabama clergymen, they felt as though those protesting should refrain from nonviolent protesting until the court system decides on their matter. The undersigned clergymen issued an "appeal for law and order and common sense," directing it towards the racial problems in Alabama. The clergymen made it clear that they felt, extreme measures in Birmingham will not be the resolution to the Negro community's problem, despite how peaceful they might be. The letter

broad categories created by Gene Sharp: nonviolent protests and persuasion, noncooperation (economic and political), and nonviolent intervention. A few groups that were involved in this movement and that displayed these categories were the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC). Despite being nonviolent called nonviolent, though, there are some occasions where

To accept Gene Sharp’s argument that the techniques of nonviolent action are more effective than the violence of military action, we must first comprehend Gene Sharps interpretation of what military action is. Gene Sharp defines military action, when he states “Military action is based largely on the idea that the most effective way of defeating an enemy is by inflicting heavy destruction on his armies, military equipment, transport system, and cities.” Sharp accuses weapons for being the reason

Peace Over Violence In the 1950s till present day we still use nonviolent resistance to stand up for what we believe is right. Nonviolent resistant protests were one way for Civil Rights leaders used to advance their cause in the 1950s and 1960s. These protests lead to the Civil Rights act of 1964. This act outlawed discrimination based on color, race, religion, sex, or national origin. It starts with civil disobedience, which is the act of opposing a law one considers unjust and