Open access

Introduction Impact factor – Garfield1 first mentioned the idea of an impact factor in 1955, and it was only in the early 1960s he, along with Irving H Sher, created the journal impact factor to help select journals for Science Citation Index. The evolution of the idea of the impact factor is well documented 2. From then on, it has been used widely

have access to academic literature, due to the high cost of purchasing subscriptions for the academic journals, and that is

followed by detailed explanation of how to gain in-depth knowledge about subjects or issues being discussed. This association is a credible resource where individuals can gain knowledge about the different area related to clinical science, but to get access to resources like scholars in the field of clinical science individuals need to be members and the process to become one can be lengthy and certain credentials are required. However, enough information is presented to non-member to gain information

Final Reflection Essay Throughout this semester, I have seen an improvement in my writing skills and the way I develop my essays. I have always had a passion for creative writing, but when writing academic papers, I lacked technique and correct grammar. I made exceptional grades on my writing assignments in high school, but I learned quickly that English college classes are much more challenging. Being in my first college English class helped me learn how important class attendance and participation

English 123 – Composition II: Assignment Three Tiffany O’Neill Southern New Hampshire University While I appreciated that one of my peers provided feedback on my work, I feel that the feedback that was provided did not fulfill the assignment. My peer did not provide detailed feedback on my paper that could be adequately incorporated in my review and revisions. Most of the information that was provided as feedback were simply statements that reiterated what the prompt question was.

Autism Spectrum Disorder, also known as ASD, can affect a person’s understanding of the environment that they live in. More specifically, it refers to a person’s group of pervasive neurodevelopmental disorders that can moderately or severely disrupt their functioning in regards to their social skills, expressive and receptive communication, and repetitive or stereotyped behaviors and interests (Cullinan, Pennington and Southern). Having analyzed both “Scientists link 60 genes to autism risk” a mass

When Research, Peer Review and Writing Style Meet Bringing new evidence based practice to the bedside involves a multi-faceted approach involving research, peer review, and publication of new ideas. Research is necessary for the discovery of scientific advancement. Peer review is necessary to ensure the integrity of research findings prior to publication. Adherence to writing principles and style are necessary to convey research findings vetted by peer review. Poorly written research findings

Movie Analysis This paper presents analysis of five movies and the analysis of every movie examined various aspects film form which range from visual design, literary design, editing, cinematography and sound design. First and foremost, we have the Lemon Movie which was produced by Hollis Frampton in 1969. In general, this movie is a silent movie and it has no sound at all. The Lemon Movie seems to be an experimental movie that was performed by having a static lemon. It is an ostensibly a one short

Throughout my educational life, I found it hard to be able to form new writing based on readings or other course material we were given. In college, I started becoming more willing to create these papers because that's what our main focus was. Revising was always simpler for me because I could see my mistakes and create new ideas based on my initial ones. During English 201 I feel like I blossomed as a writer and reviser when creating writing based on course materials we were given. Since critical

I have always found the peer review process to be beneficial on both ends, whether you are the writer or the reader, are being reviewed or are the reviewer. Having multiple sets of eyes proofread your paper should help more than hurt. It is your choice if you want to take the advice your peers gave. You have the option of not making any changes at all, so whether you decide to take the advice or not, it does not hurt to receive them. In Paper One, I found that peer reviewing others was a bit difficult