Oslo Accords

This agreement is known as the Oslo Accords or “Peace Process”. Just like several other peace acts in the world, the United States played a significant but limited role in making the Oslo Peace Accords happen. Although the agreement had high potential to work, the amount of lying, accusing, trust issues, corruption, and terror for the citizens of losing their homes caused this series of agreements to fail. Between 1993 and 1998, the series of agreements

Article Review: The Rise and Fall of the Oslo Accords According to an apocryphal story, Pope John Paul once said that he believes there are two possible solutions to the Arab-Israeli conflict, the realistic and the miraculous. The realistic being divine intervention, and the miraculous being a voluntary agreement by both parties. On September 13th, 1993, it looked like the miraculous had happened when the Oslo Accords were signed by Prime Minister Rabin and PLO Chairman Arafat on the White House

Although the claim that the collapse of the Oslo negotiations was due to a failure of process rather than of substance carries some weight, I will argue that had the substance of the terms of Oslo been more explicit and had they avoided an open-ended gradualism approach, I doubt that the ensuing process would have had such a devastating effect on the negotiations. In the following essay I will analyse the key reasons for the failure of Oslo, namely the constructive ambiguity of the terms themselves

Palestine           In 1993, in Oslo, Norway a historic peace agreement was secretly drawn up with the hopes of bringing all the violence between the Palestinians and the Israelis to an end. Yasser Arafat, the chairman of the PLO, and Yitzhak Rabin who was prime minister of Israel at the time shook hands at the White House in front of President Bill Clinton to finalize the accords. This was the first step towards peace in a long time between the warring

incentive. The actors in the Good Friday Agreement had more incentive, or less threat in accepting the agreement. Actors in the Oslo negotiations believed that was more threat for Israel-Palestine to integrate. Also, there were significant gaps in goals and incentives they had. An attempt to understand the failure of the Oslo process can be explained with a Realist lens. The Oslo agreements are inherently Liberal agreements, focusing on collective security and the possibility of cooperation and interdependence

On the 13th of September, 1993, a seldom moment between Israeli Prime Minister, Yitzhak Rabin and Palestinian Liberation Organisation Chairman, Yasser Arafat marked a context in history. The Oslo Peace Accords had been written and signed by the two leaders – the newly found peace, marked with a single handshake. Unfortunately, this ideal of a non-violent and diplomatic future did not prevail. The peace process between Palestine and Israel failed due to the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin, subsequent

Palestinians’ bones”[Footnote]. The Oslo Accords were signed by both Israel and Palestine to end the Intifada and create a stable peace which gave Palestinians freedom and Israelis security. The Palestinian Liberation Organisation was recognised by Israel and to represent the Palestinian people in future summits. The accords failed to give either country what they desired and were never a final solution to the Middle East Crisis. Due to the failure of the Oslo accords and subsequent agreements the Palestinian

115,000 is the total estimated number of civilians, armed forces, and others involved killed since the start of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the late 19th century. Throughout the past several decades the Israeli Zionists and Palestinian natives have fought over a section of land in the Middle East for recognition as an independent or bi-national country. This has led to a war in which a peaceful solution, and not just managing the problem but attempting to end the problem is paramount. The

that Turkey started damming the rivers. Lastly Israel have military occupation that is confiscating privately owned land in the West Bank and control over Gaza, and the Palestinians are having lesser control over their lives. Based on the Olso peace accords the territory was supposed to become a part of the Palestinian state, but it keeps getting worse due to the confiscation of land. However, the peace is not about the apartheid toward Palestine, the Palestinians

Should it be important for policymakers and specialists to think about the academic investigation of International Relations? The individuals that conduct foreign arrangements regularly disregard academic scholars. However, there is an inevitable connection between the conceptual universe of hypothesis and the present policymaking because in our current reality all nations are in a manner interdependent, and this is where the importance of the study of International Relations comes. The connections