Patriot Act Essay

law that tramples on the rites of a person or a group of people is a law that should be ignored and protested and actively broken. On the other hand a law that just lacks sense; is one that we could just live with or push to have fixed. The PATRIOT Act is the perfect law to show how the lines of how to handle bad legislation easily blur. This is a law that allows the federal government to strip a person

Security measures drastically increased after 9/11. 9/11 was an act of terrorism that would change the way the country handled privacy. Americans needed to voice their opinions after this happened and have their own rights protected. The need to protect individual rights is the utmost important aspect in a thriving U.S. society. Individual rights need to be protected to ensure there is creativity, individuality and diversity throughout the nation. Privacy is a fundamental aspect of a society and

In my opinion, I believe that Americans worry more about natural hazards than terrorist attacks and that is how I think it should be. Americans will never forget the horrific attacks of September 11th. That fateful day will forever be embedded in my mind. I still recall attempting to explain it to my son, who was only five at the time, when he asked me why anyone would want to fly planes into buildings. The news media amplifies terrorist events because quite simply put, that’s what gets the ratings

situation(s) demanded it. i. Transition: Granted, there are some US citizens that are ok with the NSA tapping into our files and personal communication wherever we are, it should be more known to the public that this occurs. I strongly believe the act of wiretapping should be a decision the individual makes, not a

History is the compilation of events and peoples perspective in events, all meshed up into a montage to create a definitive account of events. The Smithsonian website created by the American government shows a compelling selection of objects images and personal stories from the events of September 11 for the public to view at any time on the internet. Loose change is a documentary by Dylan Avery which has an opposing perspective to that of the terrorists attacking America. Both texts provide a recount

national security trump individual safety, and that some people are not worthy of humane treatment. The increasing amount of mass shootings and terrorist attacks happening in our country prove torture tactics should be used. People who commit serious acts of violence should be subject to serious methods and our military should be able to execute without hesitation. Some argue that torture shouldn’t be used the police and US military because it will undermine our value as Americans, puts

partnered up with nine different private companies in order to have access to online data. These companies include, Apple, Google, Yahoo!, Microsoft, Facebook, Dropbox, Youtube, Skype and AOL. PRISM was started in 2007, as a product of the Protect America Act under the Bush Administration. PRISM accounts for over 90% of the NSA’s data records, by far the largest program (“NSA slides explain the PRISM data-collection program”). Bullrun, also a classified encryption program, focused on the access of the medical

On the other hand, advocates justify the government’s methods of mass surveillance by claiming that mass surveillance will keep people safer through monitoring terrorists after the attacks of 9/11. It is fair to say that surveillance tools may help the NSA find out some pieces of information related to terrorism; however, the point is that it may be not a necessary mean to detect terrorists through requiring Americans to give up privacy. The 9/11 attacks are a tragedy; the reason why the attacks

After 9/11, the country was thrown into disarray and our government started to take strides trying to ensure our protection. We all knew about the new TSA and other travel restrictions, but the National Security Agency (NSA) was not nearly as transparent. The famous whistleblower, Edward Snowden, who used to work for the NSA revealed the programs bulk data collection programs. Passionate debates sparked afterwards revolving around things such as privacy and the Fourth Amendment. Those in our country

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978 was a result of “congressional investigations into Federal surveillance activities conducted in the name of national security” (Intelligence Surveillance Act, n.d.). FISA allows for judicial and congressional supervision of foreign surveillance, while maintaining the “secrecy necessary to effectively monitor national security threats”, and outlines the procedures for the physical and electronic surveillance and collection of foreign intelligence