Patriot Act Essay

justified in amassing a collection of American phone records, which creates a breach in many American citizens’ privacy. According to the FISA Amendment Act, the government has the authority to “target foreigners abroad” (ACLU) and the phone records of any communications between Americans and those foreign targets can be collected. However, this act does not allow amassing

“At the end of the day, the goals are simple: safety and security.” This quote by Jodi Rell states the mission of the United States government after the tragic event on September 11, 2001. The nation’s security before nine-eleven was not stern enough to stop a deadly attack from another country. The impact that nine-eleven had on the federal government brought many changes, including the national security. National security is the concept that a government should protect the state and its citizens

Commission Act (MCA) was unconstitutional. The MCA act of 2006, also known as HR-6166, was an act

the 4th amendment. The founders of the constitution did not predict the creation of phones and the internet and incorporate privacy to specifically include these products. Nonetheless, even if the privacy rights is not stated in the amendments, the act of invading civilian privacy without warrant is still a reach too far in regards to government capabilities to monitor its citizens. This capability can lead to corrupt power in the government

casualty emergency/threat to U.S. soil while simultaneously gathering information that could be disseminated to U.S. government officials and civilians to counteract such problems. So on November 25, 2002 President Bush signed the Homeland Security act, which instilled such actions. Thus the Department of Homeland Security was born.

The 2007 Protect America Act and the 2008 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Amendment Act are just 2 of the many steps taken by the government to expand their view and dig deeper into telephone, insurance, credit card, and housing records of citizens (Landau 56) Considering the fact that telephone and online conversations of news reporters are prime targets of such surveillance practices, it is safe to say that this act breaches the grant of freedom of the press. Such

Peaceful disobedience is a gray line in terms of laws, specifically in the United States. On one side, it may benefit the people of America. On the other, it may end up making the person who started the disobedient chain of events look like a liar and may have dire effects for said person. In Edward Snowden's case, I believe that his situation will have a positive effect for the citizen's of the United States. It opened people to the fact that the NSA is indeed looking into the personal lives of

Acts of terrorism are vicious and pitiless, taking the lives of innocent individuals. I believe that in order to stop these acts of rebellion, unconventional means of combating the threats are necessary, one of these being, wiretapping. In the article, Counterpoint: War on Terror and Wiretaps, the authors explain the controversial issue regarding the government tapping our technology. Although the process may seem excessive and invading to some, it will help save the lives of American citizens

Americans learned that from the recent news that NSA has been collecting the phone records from millions of its citizens without their knowledge. It is crucial to protect our national security but on the other hand it must not violate the constitutional rights of the US citizens. Congress is the ultimate authority to supervise executive offices have been conducting strategic intelligence activities were executed in accordance with Constitutional rights. This episode is the illustration of why congress

America has been faced with the threat of terrorism, time and time again; and the American government is dealing with the problem of preventing future terrorist attacks. So, why are Americans who are aware of the eminent threat, surprised and angered to find out that the government is collecting phone records of ordinary Americans? Shouldn’t National Security be more important the minor invasion of Americans privacy? Yes it should. In an Age where terrorism is such a close threat, Americans must