Peace process

powers. For that reason, there has been a growing concern for accountable in terms for enforcing warfare. In particular, due to the nationwide protest against the Iraq war, political accountability has became an important factor in the democratic process. The government did not have support from the people. This implies that democracy can be questioned. For that reason, the public can hold a governmental official to account by changing them in the next general election. Furthermore, the International

The League of Nations was an intergovernmental organisation founded on January 10, 1920 as a result of the Paris Peace Conference that ended the First World War. It was the first international organization whose principal mission was to maintain world peace. Its primary goals, as stated in its Covenant, included preventing wars through collective security and disarmament and settling international disputes through negotiation and arbitration. Other issues in this and related treaties included labour

engagement. That being said, Maha Ghosananda is one the monks who played a key role in rebuilding Buddhism in Cambodia after the fall of the Khmer Rouge. His work, Dhammayietras was the first program to set up for peace and non-violence in Cambodia. The Dhammayietras consisted of peace

are you here ? The firs two questions I can answer .My name is Mohammed Jordan. I am here today ,because I want explain about the possibilities of this beautiful give birth to a child. A sweet little child called Peace . The younger sibling of Hope . Let us examine our attitude toward peace itself. Too many of us think it is impossible. Too many think it unreal. But that is a dangerous, defeatist belief. It leads to the conclusion that war is inevitable, that mankind is doomed, that we are gripped

There are many players on the world stage and it is inevitable that disagreements will occur. There are a countless number of triggers that could ignite conflicts, such as border disputes, water usage rights, trade and tariff regulations. If war is an acceptable way to resolve conflict and if it is the usual and commonplace way of solving problems, then the world is at risk of being in a constant state of war, which is of no benefit to anyone. War should be justified only in specific circumstances

dehumanize the enemy so that it’s possible for soldiers to kill on command. Without this process many people would have a hard time pulling the trigger. Ken referred to the shirt the military made him wear and how they would make him yell “blood to the enemy.” Ben Peters talks about how the military has to teach you to hate, dehumanize, and view people you are fighting as “others.” He goes on to describe the process: “We never refer to the Iraqis as Iraqis because it creates to much cognitive dissonance…and

premise of Collective Security still needs cautious legislation. It is only an evolving jurisprudence and its loose ends need to be tied up through concentrated deliberation. A system of Collective Security that would serve the purposes of keeping peace and would sustain continual international onslaught needs to be developed. A coping mechanism that would stand the test of time is of utmost necessity. • QUESTIONS ABOUT ITS UTILITY: War theorists and strategists have questioned the workability

listening and gaining a strong connection with the patient and not just brushing them off, which leads to more sickness and pain. Actually listening to the patient can be medicine for them. Additionally, in one American Greetings card it argues that, with peace, quietness, and calmness the healing

Potential options: In four options of dealing with ISIS problem, there are two options are not possible to apply. In the first method ‘uniting Syrian arm forces before supporting them countering ISIS’, resolving political confrontation need a long process and time due to protecting political views and interest of two sides. The rebel will not willing to compromise with Assad’s authority. The fourth option ‘ideological counter’ also present the impossibility. As extremist, ISIS has conservative and

For the victorious parties of war to determine the process of justice makes a significant assumption that those parties will attempt to apply an extension of the just war theory to include jus post bellum in that they will endeavor for a just and lasting peace. This assumption is problematic for three reasons. First, nothing guarantees that as a belligerent concludes acts of war that it has any intention whatsoever of establishing peace. Second, the victor enjoys the privilege of deciding what constitutes