Philosophical works

Sort By:
Page 3 of 50 - About 500 essays
  • Better Essays

    Is Global Skepticism Justified? Introduction Skepticism is something that we all have to one degree or another. Some of us who carry some Limited (Local) Skepticism might question whether we can really know if the news anchor is giving us correct information or if the five day forecast is really on track this time regarding the rain it is predicting. Others subscribe to the Global Skepticism view; that is, they would argue that we cannot know anything at all, and, therefore, we can’t have knowledge

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Plato’s Republic, Socrates argues for the importance of living a just life. However, Glaucon asks why any person favors the just life over an unjust one. Glaucon would like an answer regarding this type of justice, and if it is good only for its results or good in itself. Socrates argues that justice in the individual is the balance between sprit, reason, and desire (scc. 435a). Socrates’ account of justice, displays a life in which a justice provides benefits not only for the individual, but

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Better Essays

    Skepticism argues that we do not know things about the external world. The External World Skeptic argument holds that we cannot, in principle, know things about the external world. Skeptical arguments aim to disprove the Standard Account of Knowledge, which claims that we do in fact know things about the external world. We come to know things through observation and experience, testimony, memory, introspection, and reasoning (Epistemology Lecture Notes). Skeptics claim that all of evidence we have

    • 2463 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Maryam Quraishi Professor Leon Philosophy 101 August 9, 2016 Skepticism In this paper, I will first discuss what the basic argument of skepticism is all about, then I will provide the defense of the argument: the three cases (Judy/Trudy Case, Crow/Raven and Coke/ Generic Coke case). After that, I will talk about the responses to the argument, specifically about the criticisms from Descartes and Moore; how Moore feels that perceptual evidence is enough and we can reject premise 1 and how descartes

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, portrays society's struggles between good and evil through a literary work. Golding accomplished this through the characterization of Simon and Jack; Simon is good and Jack is evil. However, as the book progresses we see that humanity isn’t just good or bad. Everyone is more like Ralph, who has never been entirely good nor bad. Throughout the book, Golding displays that every boy on the island is both good and evil at heart. The difference between each boy is

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most basic claim of skepticism, it seems to me, usually involves a version of the classic Cartesian Evil Demon Scenario (EDS). I believe that EDS should be redefined before we start an extensive discussion thereof: EDS is generally a scenario, involving an attitude towards the reality we live in (it includes both an ontological and epistemic shift in our thinking), involving questioning the basic assumption that what we perceive in that reality is not (directly) caused by the objects (phenomena

    • 2437 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Lord of the Flies In life, there are a lot of things that hold people back from doing what they want to do. One of the major things is the laws of society. William Golding’s novel, Lord of the flies, illustrates what would happen without society. After the plane crashes on the abandoned island during World War Two, a group of british boys are left alone to survive and fight for their ife. When the boys are first dropped off on the island, they still have their civilized behavior with them. It changes

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Philosophy Analytic-synthetic distinction is a conceptual distinction of statements or propositions. A statement or proposition is a content of a sentence that accepts or denies something. There are two types of propositions introduced by Kant- one is analytic proposition and other is synthetic proposition. Analytic propositions are true by definition and the predicate concept is present in the subject. Synthetic propositions are true by experience and the predicate concept is not present in the

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Decent Essays

    On the other hand, they also share similar qualities and characteristics. Both theories realize how our world is more than capable of being a dangerous place and we should not assume we are safe at all times. Military power is recognized as being important and pragmatic, and it is understood this power can easily be abused, as much as it can be functional. Another common realization between idealist and realist approaches is because there is no absolute government having power over all countries

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Perks of Being a Wallflower is a book written by Stephen Chbosky wrote a book that many people can relate to when it comes to the sayings of the characters. Sam said, “I’m going to do what I want to do. I’m going to be who I really am. And I’m going to figure out what that is.” Later in the book, the main character Charlie says a quote that has so much meaning when it comes to identity and figuring out who we really are. Charlies says, “I guess we are who we are for a lot of reasons. And maybe

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays