Plaintiff

summarize the salient facts, identify the issues before the Court, the arguments of each of the parties and provide a summary of the decision. Oasis Windows Ltd. Against Coppergate Development Inc. And Houser Homes Inc. Salient Facts The Plaintiff, Oasis Windows Ltd. filed a claim of Builders' Lien against Coppergate Development Inc. and Houser Homes Inc. in regards to the failure to pay for the windows supplied by Oasis Windows Ltd. Houser Homes was a head contractor who worked for Coppergate

number 82A04-8876-CB285, White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The lawyers in this case are Benjamin Walton, xxxxx Van Meter who represent the defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern and Jackson Welch, Amanda Babot who represent the plaintiff Debbie White. The defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern are seeking a summary judgment which is a procedural device used during civil litigation to promptly and expeditiously resolve a

Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, move for Summary Judgment on Defendant’s liability under a civil action using 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Defendants, former correctional officers, engaged in nonconsensual sexual conduct with Plaintiff, an inmate, depriving her of her right under the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution to remain free from cruel and unusual punishment. In further support of this Summary Judgment requesting that Plaintiff’s request for relief be denied, the Defendants

and Kerry Dicke, and Bart Kaufman are all the plaintiffs and appellants since they are suing and also appealing the decision. The Good Year Tire & Rubber Company is the defendant and the appellees since they are being sued and contesting the appeal. History of the case: Bob and Sallie Sumerel, Steven and Ann Berzin, Dane and Kerry Dicke, and Bart Kaufman are suing Good Year due to a the defective manufactured hose that was installed in the plaintiffs’ heating

It is not all loss or damages that happen on the premises guarantees total protection to all guest. For instance, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Utah have to use the infra hospitium rule if the innkeeper supervises guest vehicles at the parking area, garage valet or in the control of an employee, not within the premises (Sherry, 1990). Case in point, the Arguello v. Sunset Station, Inc., 252 P.3d 206 (Nev. 2011), Appellant drove to Sunset Hotel and Casino, entrusted his keys to a valet staff received a

particular incident of harassment on January 16, 2001, Plaintiffs reported Fye to Tricia Johnson, the Assistant Property Manager. At this time, Johnson did nothing about the complaint. The harassment continued, and on January 26, Plaintiffs complained to the Property Manager, Mary Frances de Rivera. In response, de Rivera verbally reprimanded Fye. This, however, did not stop Fye’s harassment. Instead of reporting the behavior to Defendant, Plaintiffs hired an attorney who wrote a letter to Defendant saying

plaintiff’s case was that during the University of Virginia’s (UVA) Men Swim team introduction or ‘welcome week’, the plaintiff along with other freshmen UVA swimmers were subjected to hazing that included acts such as, physical and mental abuse, force of obsessive alcoholic beverage intake, false imprisonment, and threats of sodomy against the freshmen swimmers. According to the plaintiff, if the underclassmen did not comply with any of the requests or duties that the upperclassmen told the underclassmen

101, 120 (2002). A plaintiff must file charges with the EEOC for either discriminatory or retaliatory acts no later than 180 or 300 days after their occurrence. Id. at 122. Untimely claims filed with the EEOC will be dismissed in court, even if related to timely retaliatory or discriminatory EEOC charges filed in court. Id. at 113. In Morgan, the court argues that the statutory time restriction furthers the policy of

The defendant did not ask whether the plaintiff was left or right handed, and the plaintiff, not knowing otherwise, put on her equipment the same way as she saw the other members of the club putting on their gear. A waiver of a right to sue is ineffective to shift the risk of a party's own willful, reckless, or gross

real property 19) The Plaintiff became a State employee on January 2, 2005 with the State of Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (WYDEQ) as Senior Environmental Analyst, and a permanent State employee on January 2, 2006. The Plaintiff then had a constitutional property right in the employment. The employment contract requires specific compliance and following those requirements is prescribed by due process of law. When those processes are deviated from the Plaintiff has his Constitutional