Plaintiff

In 2005, private plaintiffs filed a class action racial discrimination lawsuit against Walgreens, their employer in the case Tucker v. Walgreen Co., Case No. 05-CV-440-GPM. The plaintiffs alleged that Walgreens Co. practiced a national, cultural discrimination against African American employees and managers. Walgreens did this by denying their rights to be selected for entry-level positions of Assistant Manager or Management Trainees, rejecting any promotions for African American employees in the

All five (5) of the Plaintiffs claim bodily injuries as a result of the accident in question; however, to date, we still have not received any medical and/or billing records for Plaintiff, Vistal Thakkar to support his claim for past medical damages. According to the police report, Plaintiffs were not injured at the scene of the accident and the EMS were not called. (1) Plaintiff, Foram Thakkar: Plaintiff, Foram Thakkar claims injuries to her neck and lower back. Currently, she does not claim

to honour their promise to accept part payment and this part payment would carry on until the creditor reactivates their right to the original sum. In the above case, the agreement was confirmed in writing on 3rd January 1940. Judgement for the plaintiff was granted because by the beginning of 1945 the

Darlene E.B Hines Professor Hudson BUSI 301 Fall September 22, 2013 Courtroom Observation: 2008 1L Moot Court Tournament at the Liberty University School of Law, White V. Gibbs CA# -8776-CV285. This case is between the (plaintiff) Mrs. White and the (defendants) Patrick Gibbs and Stand Alone Properties, L.L.C. as O’Malley’s Tavern. A Motion of Summary Judgment on behalf of O’Malley’s Tavern in the US District Court of Northern District of Indiana. Is being argued/presented.

v Shire of yarra ranges & Anor 1. Details of the case Plaintiff Fiona Burch( W/o late Michael) Defendats Shire of south yarra Quality roads PVT LTD Location Melbourne Incident Transport Accident Incident commenced 13/11/1998 Date hearing 04/11/ 2004 2. Explanation of the incident  Mr Michael Burch expired while his four wheeler vehicle clean off in YR ( yarra ranges) shire on 13th November, 1998.  Fiona Burch with her two kids (plaintiff) claims a case against shire of YR, and a company of quality

Angelica Keller (Plaintiff) vs. Southwest Airlines Co. /Jane Doe (Defendants): Angelica Keller: Resident of Smyma, Rutherford County Tennessee Southwest Airlines: A corporation organized under the laws of the State of Texas, doing business in Tennessee. A common carrier of passengers for hire. Jane Doe: An unidentified flight attendant employed by Southwest, Acting within her duties for the business of Southwest when the negligence occurred. Facts The Plaintiff was flying on South West flight

Legal Process Paper John’s first step in the process is to go online or visit the nearest EEOC office. There they have an assessment system consisting of two parts. To determine if the EEOC is the appropriate agency to give John help, Part one asks general questions about the complaint. John will be asked if he wants to complete Part two after he answers the Part one questions which will ask more specific questions about his situation and will allow him to submit this information to the EEOC

Mims Distributing Company, Inc., Civil Action No. 5:14-CV-00538 1. Who were the parties to the lawsuit? How were they related? The parties in this lawsuit are: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) (plaintiff) and Mims Distributing Company, Inc (defendant), the EEOC is the plaintiff on behalf of Christopher Alston (Lally, 2015). Christopher Alston was a potential employee of the Mims Distributing Company, Inc. 2. What was the nature of the issue in the suit? The nature of this case concerns

The court denied the plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict based on the issue of product alteration. Both the plaintiff and the defendant argue that the court should have granted a directed verdict as to whether Stark’s injuries were caused by product alteration. Both parties will have to argue and prove that because of this denial, the outcome of the case was drastically

My Day In A Civil Court On February, 27, 2012 I took a trip down to the City Courthouse. After driving around looking for the courthouse, I found a parking spot, and entered the Courthouse just after 9 a.m. Upon arriving at the courthouse, I had no expectations, since this trip was my first visit. However, I did notice quite the crowd entering and exiting out of the courthouse. Nonetheless, I moved on ahead and walked toward the entrance. Once inside, I observed two security guards, and a large