police accountability essay

Kappeler, Sluder, & Alpert (1998) explain that through the police subculture deviance enters into law enforcement. The police character that is developed can be attributed to several paradigms such as psychological, sociological, and anthropological. The individual personalities of an officer and the authoritarian personality, characterized by cynicism, aggression, and conservatism, is that the psychological paradigm analyzes (p. 85). The socialization process which officers experience when they

falling on police to curtail it. Unfortunately, the infectious nature of crime often drags these assigned “stoppers” into the same mud that they are trying to prevent others from falling into. When officers abuse their legally sanctioned position of authority, it is known as police corruption. It is a persistent problem that is more significant in a criminal sense than the average person committing a crime because it is happening by a representative/protector of the law. Since police are not judiciaries

of a criminal justice agency listed in the text is that of accountability to the public (Cronkhite, 2013). This type of accountability is mirrored in the Seattle Police Department’s code of ethics. When the code of ethics speaks of justice, both racially and socially, the department recognizes the accountability that it holds to the community (Seattle Police Department Code of Ethics, 2015). Essentially, this is the recognition that police departments, or criminal justice agencies in general, should

Introduction Recent news headlines with vivid video evidence of police brutality have inspired debates around law enforcement’s use of excessive force particularly against those in minority communities. Historically, there has been tension between minority communities and law enforcement resulting in mutual distrust. In order to dissolve these tensions and build this trust, policy initiatives have been put in place to encourage accountability and transparency. This paper will discuss the prospects that

ineffective management on behalf of the Rixton Police Chief provide evidence of non-compliance of departmental procedures and the lack of accountability of the Chief of police to his officers and citizens and that of the officers alike to the citizens or Rixton. As the Rixton case study indicates the Chief Eager has “little administrative ability” and “he makes no effort to determine whether his officers understand his policies and procedures...” (Police Administration, 2016), as such, an inference

Kappeler, Sluder, & Alpert (1998) explain that through the police subculture deviance enters into law enforcement. The police character that is developed can be attributed to several paradigms such as psychological, sociological, and anthropological. The individual personalities of an officer and the authoritarian personality, characterized by cynicism, aggression, and conservatism, is that the psychological paradigm analyzes (p. 85). The socialization process which officers experience when they

excessive force in apprehending suspects. Also, there is no law that gives police officers authority over human rights. Every police officer is bound by the law

which did not jarringly force change possessed a stronger, and more capable accountability infrastructure. While changes made in reformation is not self-sustaining and do not guarantee change. The Pittsburgh and Cincinnati Police Departments showed that implementing new programming and protocols which officers are favorable toward without forcing their culture to change had the most success. Whereas the Washington Metro Police saw a steady increase in misconduct after reform was implemented as a form

citizens receive from the police in addition to how the citizens interact with police. Video footage has shown police brutality that is sometimes questionable, which often dictates on the how the community views them by causing tension. Accusations of Police brutality is nothing new but it isn’t until recently that it is being recorded and it is difficult to correct the actions of someone if there is not enough evidence provided. Recent advancements in technology police accountable for their actions

from a growing problem that the United States has been having a major problem with police violence. Though some might argue that the wearing of body cameras violate privacy, in fact the use of the cameras will minimize violence, show accountability, and a human side of policing. These body cameras would help serve by providing video evidence that can be referenced and use anytime allegations are made against police officers and criminals alike. The use of these body cameras are somewhat in the evaluation