Policy Of Appeasement Essay

In my opinion, appeasement was a huge mistake on the part of the Allied nations. It allowed Nazi Germany to gain an enormous amount of power, consequently posing a threat to all of Europe. Appeasement encouraged Hitler’s aggression as he gained increased confidence after capturing each new piece of land without any intervention by the League of Nations. The policy of appeasement is what allowed Hitler to successfully transfer troops to the Rhineland in 1936 which led to further military actions (e

aggressive foreign policy largely contributed to the outbreak of World War II. Revisionist and orthodox views regarding Hitler’s foreign policies can both be argued. The orthodox view suggests Hitler’s actions were the main contributors to the outbreak of war, whereas the revisionist view counterclaims the policy of appeasement, and foreign policies of Japan and Italy were primary contributors. Adolf Hitler, Chancellor of Germany from 1933 to 1945, assumed responsibility for German foreign policy in January

Was Appeasement a ‘Mistake’? H/W 07.03.13 There are many arguments for and against appeasement before WW2. Appeasement was a policy between Britain, France and Germany. The policy meant that the allies would give Germany what they wanted as long as they didn’t start a war or cause trouble. The Dictionary definition of appeasement is: (Government, Politics & Diplomacy) the policy of acceding to the demands of a potentially hostile nation in the hope of maintaining peace. Many people now

and international responsibilities. The source above states that a nation has two responsibilities, the responsibility to their country and the international community. Moreover, the policies made during the Interwar period demonstrate the ineffectiveness of searching for a substitute. First, the Western appeasement towards Nazi Germany marked a failed attempt to maintain peace. Furthermore, the Swiss neutrality demonstrated a better way of avoiding war, although to the expense of other nations.

Appeasement was not the right policy for Britain in 1938 because without this policy, Britain and France could have stopped Hitler and World War 2 from occuring. The appeasement policy was not ideal for Europe. It proved to allow Hitler opportunities to gain control over most of Europe. Winston Churchill, a politician and army leader, stated that, “I have always held the view that the maintenance of peace depends upon the accumulation of deterrents against the aggressor, coupled with a sincere effort

Appeasement The task of explaining why appeasement, has been continuously addressed by historians over the years. To date, there is still no single cause identified. Nonetheless there is however a general consensus amongst historians that the frightful events of world war one, distilled a sense of fear and regret amongst British society, and consequently Britain strived to prevent any future war, through whatever means necessary. In the aftermath of World War 1, lay a mutual understanding

“The policy of appeasement was a mistake”. How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer. The policy of appeasement was used as a way to attempt to satisfy Hitler’s requirements to stop his waging war on the allies. This was for many reasons for example Chamberlain dislike the idea of war and he knew they were not prepared to fight a war against Germany. One of the most famous examples of appeasement is the Munich conference where Britain handed over Czechoslovakia to Hitler without

Justifying Appeasement Appeasement was the foreign policy followed by the British and French governments in the 1930s, whereby they did not attack or confront other governments, specifically that of Germany's, when international laws were breached, but rather gave into some of the demands to keep the peace. After the horror and dramatic loss of innocent lives (amassing over 3 million) in the First World War, both the French and the British governments were keen

Appeasement was thought to be a way of keeping Germany at bay, however, it was proven to be an ineffective policy as subsequently, war broke out in 1939. Appeasement was a major contributor to World War 2 as it allowed Hitler to build his military power until it was strong enough to fight a world scale war. In addition, appeasement emboldened Germany, as the allies never wanted to succumb to yet another war. Hitler was aware that the appeasement policy was a massive compromise to Hitler, and in someways

relationships between the powers changed greatly in their nature, coinciding with a shift in the balance of power. The Entente Cordiale of 1904 can certainly be seen as a key turning point, along with other factors such as Neville Chamberlain’s policy of appeasement, the Cuban Missile Crisis and the SALT I and II agreements. The signing of the Entente Cordiale in 1904 epitomised the ever-growing division on the European stage in the early 1900s, and certainly contributed to a pre-war alliance which precipitated