Political thought

that the oppressed people have to see beyond themselves and understand their situation, so that they can start thinking about their world. It could be achieved by the dialogue in education. As critical consciousness and the resulting combination of thought and action is the key to restore humanity, or to become humanised again. Freire believed that only the oppressed can save themselves and also the

information when needed. It can also be used in racial, political, and religious ways and many more ways. Stereotyping in a racial way is judging people by the color of their skin, where they come from, or the language they speak. It can be both good and bad to stereotype, it just depends on how it is being said. Stereotyping in a religious way is judging people by what they believe in. Stereotyping in a political way is judging people in the political party they support.

People have many different ways of thinking, including those of Voltaire's free thought and Confucius’ Confucianism. A mind can constantly search for another way to do things, as well as, follow a set path placed before the human eyes. Both, the free-thinking mindset used by Voltaire and the Confucianism mindset used by Confucius have advantages and weaknesses. Some of the ideas weaknesses are free thinking doesn’t have a central idea to focus on while Confucianism focuses heavily on one topic and

In the fall of my seventh grade year at Kent Denver, my grades were not quite as good as my parents wanted. I believed my grades were fine, but my parents obviously thought otherwise. I already had less freedom to do things because I had broken my arm early in the fall. So it came as a shock when my parents restricted the things I could do and put more rules in place around the house. I felt trapped and I wanted to be able to do more things. This got me thinking about freedom. I realized while I

clothes to our political views mostly everything we do is influenced by the outside world in some way. The megaphones in our lives today do a lot more than just influencing. The megaphones in our world can range from the people we look up to, to our political leaders, parents, and mostly mainstream media. He gives us simple, but perfect examples of how they intrude their thoughts with ours. How the way a simple voice change can make us think completely different than the way we thought of it before

that other people can understand and relate to because they have either experienced what the art piece represents or because they have thought of the same concept. I found it interesting how the four students interpreted the same piece of music differently and how drastically different their representation of their concepts were. For example, while one took a political stance, the other took a more philosophical view of good vs. evil. I think this shows their personality and their thinking style and

the dogs were the main attention grabber in both scenes. The dragging dog was very surreal, cruel and yet funny. When I saw the comment from Slant Magazine blog that Andersson’s vision is dark and satirical humor and not yet entirely hopeless, I thought of this dog scene because the dog was hopeless, but everyone was laughing. Throughout the whole scene, I was just trying to see if he actually dragged a real dog. However, I think another element that added to the comical side of this cruelty is the

in society. It labels a person about how they should live or act according to their sex, race, and personality. In all work forces it is a law to not discriminate against employees or other people in the facility. It can also be used in racial, political, religious, and many more ways. Stereotyping in a racial way is judging people by the color of their skin, where they come from, or the language they speak. Stereotyping can be a big issue in many professional businesses and environments. It can

forward from Rochelle’s work in 2002 now I am going to look at piece of work she published in 2011. In the article Beyond Gap Gazing: How Can Thinking About Education Comprehensively Help us (Re)envision, Rochelle prompts the readers with a few thought provoking questions about the state of research today in mathematics education. With a main focus on some of the main issues that are in research today through an achievement gap lens readers are forced to grapple with the idea of how mathematics

something to say about our lives. The author viewed as the events in our lives were just a reason to be talked about but also the fear of not being talked about, is what people fear the most. He mostly uses his knowledge to inform the readers of his thoughts on conspiracy and the 21st century. point of view on this informative subject. The author values that we as the general audience dramatize everything by nature, no matter how small the stories are. He also emphasizes the word “paranoia” throughout