have not considered writing for political correctness in my own writing, until lately. In general, I write for my own pleasure. I would enjoy having some of my writing published but that has not been my primary aim. If I was to pursue writing for publication, I understand I would need to further consider my audience. Depending on whether my audience was local or global would influence my writing and editing process. I would consider modifications that would streamline my writing and make it easy for
Aiming to achieve political correctness within my own writing presents challenges, especially in online classrooms without the benefit of relational capital. In other words, writing papers for a faceless audience demands appropriate vocabulary to satisfy the rhetorical context of a written assignment without sacrificing my authentic ideas, expression, and intentions. Considering how a reader may perceive and interact with my content remains as top priority during the all three rounds of editing.
Context: Foster gives the depiction that when “political” writing speaks to everyone it does achieve its purpose. Its purpose that alerts even the youngest soul that something must be done, in order to live in a better and more harmonious world. Additionally, Foster address how practically all writing is political. Political in the sense, that there are a lot of problems in the world that needs fixing and subconsciously, writers tend to write about them. (C): This particular passage would stand
Camus’s Political Writing/Career Through his political writing, Camus expresses a variety of philosophical ideologies that are in many ways similar to those expressed in “The Stranger.” In the writing, Camus explores various ideas that are reflective of how society appears to him. * 1943 Joined a French resistance called the “Combat” who opposed the Nazis. Had an underground newspaper; Camus became the editor, under the name “Beauchard,” criticized French collaboration with the Nazis ”Now
Hobbes writings of political and moral philosophy remain some of the most influential and important reference points in contemporary affairs. One drive in human nature, fear, is a central theme in his works regarding political thought. His thesis works with ideas that order consists of existing harmoniously through avoidance of both danger and the manipulating fear of civil conflict, which can be achieved through our entire faith in single, unaccountable sovereignty of a person or group. Firstly
Hobbes writings of political and moral philosophy remain some of the most influential and important reference points in contemporary affairs. One drive in human nature, fear, is a central theme in his works regarding political thought. His thesis works with ideas that order consists of existing harmoniously through avoidance of both danger and the manipulating fear of civil conflict, which can be achieved through our entire faith in single, unaccountable sovereignty of a person or group. Firstly
Posterity". It's blatantly obvious that the history of America, up until Alexis de Tocqueville wrote Democracy in America, had any of those attributes been granted wholly. Liberty is relatable to the State of Nature, John Locke describes in his Political Writings. Liberty is a state of entire freedom - in thought, practice, mores, etc. Tocqueville argues that Liberty is a boundary, an imaginative idea, and almost an unreachable goal in the Democratic state of America. Tocqueville
closely to the reading of Augustine, City of God in Political Writing. In the reading Augustine mentions the City of God and the Earthly City, which has correlation with society and Christianity. He has two more points that relate to the theme of Christianity and Society. These points are the Republic, which discusses the genuine right of justice and the three ways to live life according to Augustine. Augustine’s City of God in Political Writing relates to the theme of Christianity and Society because
roots in violent historical times which are seen reflected in their respective theories about the use of violence in politics. The legitimate use of violence is a topic addressed by both theorists in their respective works, as read in Selected Political Writings and The Leviathan. Who has the monopoly over the use of violence, what its terms of use are, and what the consequences of its use are, are distinct from the works of both Machiavelli and Hobbes. Hobbes’ believed that the world, as well as humanity
in an attempt to gain a political position in the new government that was being established in Italy by the Medici family. Although his book did not get him in to a governmental position like he was hoping for, the book he wrote would become very influential to many others. The One thing that does set his book apart from other philosophers is that he wrote the book not on how things should be, but how things need to be in order for one to keep power and order. The writing of The Prince however, did