This case study should have addressed provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), and what Privacy Impact Assessments (PIA) must describe. One of the provision of the Privacy Act of 1974 is that provides individual access to his or her record or any information that the federal government has about him or her. According to the Privacy Act of 1974 one of the provisions is that an individual can request his archives in stored by federal agency
Privacy The misuse of our personal information collected by private and public institutions has made privacy, or the lack of it, a major societal concern today. One of the biggest reasons privacy has become such an issue is the enactment of the “Patriot Act”, signed into law in reaction to the attacks on 9/11/2001. This act broadened the ability for the US government to collect surveillance on people in order to protect against terrorism inside the US. Critiques say it violates our civil liberties
personal information, but for companies such as, Google to send out that personal information to other companies that we know nothing about is another way in which we, as citizens, lose even more control. The government not only threatens our Internet privacy, but also “chills free speech and free
The Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, establishes a code of fair information practices that governs the collection, maintenance, use, and dissemination of information about individuals that is maintained in systems of records by federal agencies. A system of records is a group of records under the control of an agency from which information is retrieved by the name of the individual or by some identifier assigned to the individual. The Privacy was enacted for the use of computerized databases
The Electronic Communication Privacy Act is protection against the illegal interception of citizens’ digital communication methods. The act establishes and restricts access to electronic means of communicating and prohibits the authorization of the government and employers to do so without given consent. Although the act establishes protection to citizens against illegal interception people should take into account for what and from whom they send out their information. There are many problems with
The Federal Privacy Act was implemented in 1974 to establish a co de of fair information policies that dominate the selection, upkeep, use, and the spread of information abou t individuals that is conserved in systems of records by federal agencies. This act was put into place to protect individuals’ privacy from the embezzlement of Federal records, to ensure that individuals be allowed entry to records concerning them which are maintained by Federal agencies. Priva cy laws are concerning laws
now able to store access and monitor employees’ actions on company computing systems. In 1986, The Electronic Communication Privacy Act (ECPA) was introduced which disallow the intentional interception of “any wire, oral or electronic communication”, it provides an exemption that permits right to monitor employees in the course of business (Beesley, 2012). According to the act, if the employee is using equipment owned by the employer then employer is allowed to monitor an employee’s use of computer
There are some laws that address pieces of data protection such as the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) which imposes certain restrictions to websites targeted at children limiting what they can and can’t keep. Or the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) which tries to maintain data security standards throughout the government in the most efficient way possible. However, most of the regulatory power
Abstract The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) was a pretty progressive law at the time it was enacted. It enhanced the privacy protection that was originally delineated in the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 by also adding communication protection for pagers, email, cell phones, service providers, and computer transmissions. The ECPA addressed the legal privacy issues that were surfacing with the rising use of networks, computers and other new innovations in electronic
The electronics communications privacy act is something I find very disturbing and it has affected me personally in a work situation. At the time the man I was working for was a licensee for a larger franchise and was going through a legal dispute at the corporate office. I emailed the owner from my work email when the evidence of my boss’s demise was clear in hopes to ensure my future with the company was in place. When I arrived at work the next morning the licensee holder and my boss had already