Problem Of Evil For An Atheist Essay

for three interrelated questions. “1) Are there arguments for atheism based on the existence of evil that may rationally justify someone in being an atheist? 2) How can a theist defend this position against the argument for atheism based on the existence of evil? 3) What position should the informed atheist take concerning the rationality of their belief?” Rowe makes sure the reader known what kind of evil is being dealt with or is being used in the argument which is the central concept of the whole

continues to create and prepares our community for His coming. Most people usually ask why God allowed imperfections, problems and sins in everything He created. Why did God allowed evil in his creation? As the most powerful of all, God can easily remove evil in His creations but He still allowed evil. It is not because He doesn’t love us; it is just to test us. He allowed evil to linger in our world for us to help each other and conquer all the hardships and challenges in our daily living. He is

HJ McCloskey is a proclaimed atheist. He presents lots of arguments including the belief of why there is no God. He also says that atheism is a more comfortable belief. He states that it is impossible for a higher power to create an imperfect world. McCloskey thinks that even if there was a maker than how can people be comforted by Him instead of blaming him for creating an imperfect world with evil and imperfections. McCloskey is a very smart man, but he did not give evidence to why the world is

For atheists, apologetics, and non-believers, a big topic of contention is the existence of evil in a world with God. This is known as the problem with evil. How does a God that is all knowing, all powerful, and perfectly good allow such atrocities to occur under his watch? It is this question that so many people have discussed. The argument centers on God being omnipotent, omniscient, and perfectly good (Mackie, 1955 p. 200). Omnipotent is to be all powerful. Omniscient is to be all knowing and

The problem of evil as suffering is a problem of what to do with the obstacle for the believer but also an obstacle to unbeliever to converge because they do not think it harmonising. In contradiction to compatibility, an atheist often suggested that the present of evil entails the absence of God. Atheist argued, if God exists, then as an omnipotent, he is able to prevent the evil occurrence. For omniscient, it implies under any circumstances evil will occur if he does not act. Then, being perfectly

H. J. McCloskey, in his article “On Being an Atheist” is explaining why he believes that atheism is more acceptable than theism. He starts by letting other atheists know that he plans to explain why theists place their beliefs in the existence of God, why theists arguments fall short of proof, why atheists take the stance that God does not exist, and the view that theists have of atheism being a sad, unfriendly view. McCloskey begins his explanation of these beliefs and views by arguing against three

Problem of Evil The argument for the existence of God has been a debate for many centuries. God, in terms of philosophy, must be a supernatural being that: is all-knowing, is all-powerful, and is all-good. Theists believe God exists based on these terms; atheists on the other hand don’t believe in God. Atheists believe that if there is evil present in the universe, then there is no possible way God can exist if he is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent. Evil is defined in three different

The infamous atheist philosopher, Richard Dawkins, once said that the concept of God is a “delusion” and that it is “something people believe in despite a total lack of evidence.” I disagree with Dawkin’s statement as the existence of God can be proved by the existence of evil as one cannot exist without the other. I believe that the existence of evil proves that God exists as it was this argument that led former atheist; the Chronicles of Narnia author C.S. Lewis, to believe in the existence of

The atheist holds that there is severe contradiction between claiming God is good, yet evil exists. Mackie, an atheist, says "...the contradiction does not arise immediately; to show it we need some additional premises...these additional principles are that good is opposed to evil, in such a way that a good thing always eliminates evil as far as it can, and that there are no limits to what an omnipotent thing can do. From these it follows that a good omnipotent thing eliminates evil completely

“The problem of evil” has been the most powerful argument going against God’s existence. The core argument is whether the occurrence of evil in the world is an indication that God has never existed or questions the reason to believe in such a God. Since God has been understood from tradition to be omnipotent and supremely good, the existence of evil raises questions on His existence. This paper compares and contrasts the ontological and the teleological arguments of God’s existence with the problem