Raw score

and agreement needed to be reached on how to score each project before scores were recorded. If project scoring required a lengthy decision, that was set aside for a different time so that team members could get through this process fairly quickly (Kloppenborg, 2009, p.36-37). This entire process was recorded into a spreadsheet. How the projects were ranked, how each project was scored on each criterion and the calculation of the weighted scores were all recorded on the spreadsheet. The team

Net Promoter Score is becoming an increasingly popular tool used by many companies who try to assess customer loyalty. The Net Promoter Score is based from a model developed by Frederick Reichheld in the book, “The Ultimate Question” (Beyond 2). The system helps measure customer loyalty between an organization and a consumer. The Net Promoter score was designed on an 11-point scale from (0 to 10) and it separates the customers into promoters, passives and detractors (beyond 2). Promoters are people

skills training. On the verbal reasoning assessment I scored a 148 which placed me in the 36% ranking which seemed to be middle of the road. On the Quantitative reasoning assessment I scored a 151 which placed me in the 45% ranking making my total score a 299. One of my greatest areas of weakness on any test or class work is and always will be my math skills. I am able to complete basic math abilities and even some algebra with little effort. However, when dealing with complex numerical problems I

measured attribution dimensions in relation to the previous statement. These questions could be answered on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (completely) and each began with asking “In general, to what extent is your reason something that…”. Higher scores refer to more controllable, stable (except for the item “fluctuates across performances”, which was reverse scored), global and universal attributions. Controllability items were: “you could control in the future”, “in the future, you could exert

Jeff Styles started a small growing business called Data Tech, Inc. out of his two-car garage. Data Tech, Inc. is a company that specializes in transferring hard copies of various business documents onto CDs . The company started out with anywhere from 10,000-30,000 pieces of mail daily, which proposed a challenge as business continued to flourish. Since he has accumulated an increasing number of corporate customers with long-term contracts, Styles has realized that his two-car garage is now an insufficient

difficulties, the following scores can be stated as valid representations of their respective abilities at this point in time. Assessment Instruments Wechsler Individual Achievement Test—Third Edition (WIAT-III) The WIAT-III is a clinical instrument used to assess and provide a measure the achievement and overall academic functioning in individuals between the ages 4 to 50 and is administered individually. It is composed of 16 subtests that provide 7 composite scores, they are the Oral Language

Reason for Referral In order to experience the administration and evaluation of educational appraisals, the examiner conducted intelligence and academic assessments with Kael Stafford as well as interviewed Shannon Stafford, Kael’s mother to determine his behaviors. As a result of the assessments and interview, the examiner identified Kael’s strengths and weaknesses in various areas. The examiner administered the assessments to Kael applying standard evaluation procedures. Background Informational

domains. These scores seem to indicate Peter is aware of these personal attributes that have been so frequently documented in the educational record. Students who are aware of these propensities are more likely to attempt to self-regulate said behavior, and typically respond better to interventional strategies. Moreover, the student is reporting adequate levels of connectedness with his family and his teachers, as evidenced by his Attitude to Teachers and Relations with Parents scale scores. These sorts

I chose to do my review on the Differential Ability Scales. This particular test appealed to me because it tests children from ages 2 through 17 with varying developmental levels. Some of the things measured are cognitive abilities, which includes verbal and visual working memory, understanding of basic number concepts, processing and naming speed, and matching and visual recognition. The Differential Ability Scales is an individually administered battery of cognitive and achievement tests for

Rationale for the Research Robinson, Dailey, Hughes, and Cotabish (2014) sought to discover the impact of teacher professional development, as well as, a problem-based curriculum on gifted, elementary student’s science achievement. The study compared two groups of students in grades second through fifth by placing them into a treatment group versus a comparison group. Over the course of a two-year period, STEM starters provided 120 hours of professional development to teachers in a problem-based