reintegrative shaming essay

Reintegrative shaming theory demonstrates an approach where an offender can be restored in society by removing the label and categorizing them as deviant. According to John Braithwaite, a professor from Australian Nation University, predicted that those offenders who are exposed to reintegrative shaming theory would commit fewer crimes and would build a stronger interdependent relationships. Also, stigmatization only promotes the perpetrator to commit a criminal action and influences others to believe

With the limitations of traditional criminological theories and the failings of the traditional criminal justice system, John Braithwaite’s reintegrative shaming theory provides a refreshing alternative to previous retributive and penal approaches (Braithwaite, 1989; White, Haines & Asquith, 2012). With its emphasis on cultural integration, the theory has shown utility amongst practitioners and academics (Kim & Gerber, 2012; Hay, 2001). However, despite its value, Braithwaite’s theory has not been

implications on labeling theory and the criminal justice system. They believe that the criminal justice system is the main key of setting people in illegal occupations. As there are different effects of labeling, one of the theorist Braithwaite theory shaming theory will explain on what effects labeling partakes. When a person is labeled with a negative term such as a criminal they will act just as they are called a person who commits a crime. If a teenager is label as a delinquent because he or she cuts

that has been caused through a crime. In his book Crime, Shame and Reintegration, Braithwaite proposes key elements. He talks about different theories that may explain why one would commit a crime, the family model of reintegrative shaming, uncoupling shame and punishment, shaming in different

The Theory of Reintegrative Shaming The reintegrative shaming theory remains common practice in the numerous criminal justice systems around the world. Through the reintegrative theory, the justice system sought to create a long-lasting bond between offenders and the society. John Braithwaite designed and formulated the reintegrative shaming theory seeking to avail a feasible alternative to the social labeling theory (Zhang, 2004). In his theory, John indicated two types of reintegrative processes that

Reintegration or Stigmatization Concerns are often raised when reintegrating offenders back into society. Society’s ideology on crime is often shaped from what they see and what they hear. The media often times places a strong emphasis on punishment when a crime is committed and the idea of reintegrating a variety of offenders back into society is unsettling for many. This can create stigmas and barriers for offenders to become productive members of society. “Simply defined, offender reintegration

What is labelling theory? Labelling theory is they theory of how self-identity and behavior of individuals may be determined or influenced by the terms used to describe or classify them. It is associated with the concepts of self- fulfilling the prophecy and stereotyping. This theory is coming associated with the sociology of criminal and deviance, where it is used to point out how social processes of labelling and treating someone as criminally deviant fosters deviant behavior, which then can lead

Braithwaite’s reintegrative shaming is a theory used to reintegrate the offender back into the community without condemning the individual but the individual’s behavior. Ray, Dollar, & Thames (2011) use Braithwaite’s theory to suggest that “when reintegrative shaming is used, offenders are less likely to recidivate because they are accepted back into the community and their morality is strengthened.” Braithwaite’s theory is divided into two different forms of shaming. The successful form of shaming is reintegrative

The labeling theory is one of the critical perspective sociological theories of crime. Labeling theory was the first of the critical perspectives and like the other critical perspectives, it considers defining crime, as well as applying a label to those who commit what is defined as a crime to be problematic. Among the issues addressed by labeling theory are defining deviance based on primary deviance through implementing a label on the offender, discrimination by formal institutions, as well as

Psychological research shows that eyewitness testimony is not always accurate; therefore it should not be used in the criminal justice system. Discuss. Word Count: 2,589 There has been considerable interest and study in the accuracy or inaccuracy of the use of eyewitness testimonies in the current criminal justice system. Results collated by several studies add to the bulk of literature suggesting that the current usage of eyewitness testimony by the legal system is far from ideal