Relativism Essay

Cultural relativism -“the principle of regarding the beliefs, values, and practices of a culture from the viewpoint of that culture itself". Cultural Relativism relies on the hypothesis that ethical frameworks, which differ throughout the world, are all plausible in their own individual right .If you buy into the thought of cultural relativism, one tends to suspend judgment of other societies controversial rituals and practices. Thus to ‘completely accept” all customs must blur our perception of

Cultural relativism is the theory where there is no objective truth in morality, and moral truths are determined by different cultures. The primary argument used to justify cultural relativism is the cultural differences argument, which claims different cultures have different moral practices and beliefs, therefore, there is no objective truth in morality (Newton). After reading James Rachels The Challenge of Cultural Relativism, I find his criticisms to be persuasive because the argument made for

According to society’s knowledge, many can come to an agreement that cultural relativism and diversity can play a huge effect on whether different cultures and traditions share the same respect for morals and values towards each other. However, these two things can be considered as two widespread theories that are used to explain the differences amongst different varieties of cultures, their ethics, and their morals. Between the two theories, both characterize the moral, ethical, and societal differences

either ethical objectivism or ethical relativism. Though there are arguments both in favor and against each perspective, the outlook one will adopt depends on the individual and his or her background. In order to choose a position, one must understand what ethical relativism and ethical objectivism are. After looking at and understanding both positions, one is able to make a logical decision about which position he or she believes is the correct one. Ethical relativism is often defined with the simple

perceive certain situation contrary to what we believe is right and wrong. Relativism allows us to question ourselves and consider the fact that there might not be a wrong or right action, good or evil characters, “true”, “absolute”, or universal answer (Williams & Arrigo, 2008, p. 67). To fully understand the concept of what relativism in the criminal justice field is about, we have to have a general understanding of the relativism components such as ethical objectivism and ethical universalism.

Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism Ethnocentrism and cultural relativism are two contrasting terms that are displayed by different people all over the world. Simply put, ethnocentrism is defined as “judging other groups from the perspective of one’s own cultural point of view.” Cultural relativism, on the other hand, is defined as “the view that all beliefs are equally valid and that truth itself is relative, depending on the situation, environment, and individual.” Each of these ideas

Cultural relativism is the attitude that an individual’s principles and customs should not be judged by others in terms that every individual has different backgrounds and beliefs. No culture is superior to any other culture as they all have different laws, or morals which they believe to be right or wrong. Everyone should be equal based on their race, gender, religion, and values. All cultures are adapted to what is right or wrong/good or bad based on their society and what they’re taught growing

drastically such is the case in the ritual sacrifice. (P.22) Cultural Relativism implies that culture decides what is moral or immoral. This belief defines in some ways a boundary to morals where objectivism failed. Several religions homosexuals are considered immoral and are judge according to the belief

Moral relativism is the view that ethical and moral statements all vary from person to person, and both opinions are equally valid because everybody has their own morals that they grew up to know. There is no ultimate standard of morality, according to moral relativism, and no statement or position can be considered ultimately right or wrong. After all, everybody is raised to believe in different ideas, and they have no reason to believe that their way of thinking is morally wrong. People are subject

oblige you to stop and think critically about your moral reasoning. Moral Relativism is ethical judgments that has a philosophized belief that right and wrong is not absolute values, nevertheless are personalized according to the person and his or her situation or cultural orientation. Therefore moral relativism comes in two forms, “what’s right for you but not for me. The second form is cultural subjective or cultural relativism saying “morality differs with different cultural” so each culture has