Reliability And Validity Essay

This research relies heavily on theoretical data especially in relation to elections taking place in the nineteenth century. Because of this one might question the validity and reliability of the conclusions. The sources I used to reach those conclusions are qualitative and they aim to understand why the elections have turned out the way they ultimately did. Some numerical data exists for the 2000 election and I will utilize those figures in relation to that election to explore corruption. While

can be utilized to assess validity and reliability of a survey instrument. These approaches are used to make certain that the survey instrument accurately captures the data that is need as well as provides reliable results of over time (Phillips, Phillips, Aaron, 2013). To assess, the validity and reliability of a survey instrument, researchers conduct a review of validity and reliability during survey pilot testing (Phillips et al., 2013). In exploring reliability, there are four types in survey

Reliability and Validity in Personality Testing 02-16-2015 Introduction Psychological tests are often used in the selection of projective personnel (Anastasia & Urbina, 1997). The idea is that by using the scientific approach to personality and emotional intelligence testing in hiring, the employers will be able to increase the number of successful employees (Beaz lll, 2013). “Personality refers to an individual’s unique constellation of consistent behavioral traits”, which

Information about the article: The article is called “Happiness as Stable Extraversion: A Cross-Cultural Examination of the Reliability and Validity of the Oxford Happiness Inventory Among Students in the U.K., U.S.A, Australia, and Canada.” It is by the following authors: Leslie Franics, Laurence Brown, David Lester, and Ronald Philipchalk. And the article is from Elsevier Science, a web-based academic publishing company that publishes scientific and medical literature. Summary of the article:

About School Instrument (FAS1), and Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index (RAPI) were used to determine if there was a link between peers’ influence, alcohol consumption and high school students’ attitudes towards school. A pilot study to test the reliability and validity of the research instruments: Peer Pressure Inventory (PPI), Feelings about School Instrument (FASI), and Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index (RAPI) were carried out in Uganda which mirrored conditions in Liberia with experiences of civil

reliability, and validity of this instrument have been tested not only in women with diabetes (Charron-Prochownik et al., 2006), but also in a general population of women (Corbett, 2011) and men (Sese, 2013). The PCHAB scale adapted in this study is a modified version of the RHAB questionnaire in order to be more applicable to the target population and the main purpose of this research. Original questions related to diabetes have been excluded and some items have been altered to reflect

15), and ‘to get good interest’ (3.71, and 0.81). To be rich man is in the 4th place for cause of human saving. Reliability and Validity Test: The right information will demonstrate the genuine outcomes. So, Cronbach alpha shows the validity and reliability of data set. Table No. 3: Reliability Test R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A) Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = 232.0 N of Items = 15 Alpha = 0 .7716 Source:

Focus group research- reliability, validity, replicability, generalisability A focus group can be defined as a group interview- centered on a specific topic and facilitated and co-ordinated by a moderator or facilitator- which seeks to generate primarily qualitative data, by capitalizing on the interaction that occurs within the group setting. The idea behind the focus group method is that group processes can help people to explore and clarify their views in ways that be less easily accessible

While sociological research is being recorded, a good sense of reliability and validity is essential for one to have. If one does not have the most honest VARIABLE being observed for their research, they might lie about what they have done. Or, the researcher could lie and all the information gathered would be tainted. If one is not directly honest with one's findings, people will not believe them without solid evidence. Research does not mean that what one finds has to be politically correct or

research design should be the validity, reliability and generalizability of the researcher’s finding. Creditable goes along ways and weighs heavy in the research world. Validity in research is measures on how much truth lies in the research by the proper tools in place for accuracy and truthfulness of scientific finding (1993). There are four different approaches to validity: face validity, content validity, criterion validity, and construct validity (2012). Validity is just like testing the hypothesis