Stroop Effect Essay

This experimental investigation has to do with how human’s attention work. It is based on a replication of the well-known “Stroop Effect” carried out on 1935 by John Ridley Stroop. The aim of this experiment was to demonstrate how hard it is for a person’s attention to be divided in different tasks, by making the participants read a series of three stimuli which consisted of: 1) words of colors in black ink, 2) words of colors in their actual font color, and 3) color words with different ink, where

The Stroop Task and Further Exploration Lesly Cabrera City College of New York The cognitive task of the Stroop task is the proof that an interference of a task has a reaction time delay. From the moment I saw the Stroop effect on my textbook and on the power point in lecture class, I grew an interest to this subject. I found it a mentally challenging task; it was tricky and therefore grasped my attention and wanted to further explore this cognitive task. As stated by MacLeod, “The Stroop effect

The aim of this experiment was to to examine the effects of incongruent ink colours on naming the colour of the text aloud and the result shows that it took the participants more time to perform condition 2 than condition 1. The mean difference between the two conditions was 3.87 seconds, which shows a significant difference. The results of this experiment highly support the results in the original; experiment conducted by Stroop (1935), who concluded that that the participants’ abilities to read

Introduction In 1935, John Ridley Stroop further researched and printed the whole idea of the Stroop effect which is also named after himself. The main purpose of the stroop experiment is to time how fast the participants are to respond to different coloured stimuli presented to them in different conditions. This measures the cognitive ability of the individuals involved as it tests the memory and focus. The work of John Ridley Stroop was originally a study that came from James McKeen Cattell (1991)

Understanding the Results: The Breakdown of the Stroop Effect The beauty of science is the fact that it is not ever a complete certainty. There are times when an experiment might yield results that conflict with prior results in past experiments, which then forces the researcher to try to account for the possibility of new findings that lay outside the range of prior discourse. This is the case here, where a variation of the Stroop test was conducted, with atypical results. After coming to these

Per. 6 ~Intro of IA~Stroop Effect~ We go throughout our busy lives, multitasking with many objects that come across us. We tend to text and drive, eat and watch television, and even walk and chew gum at the same time. We need to get a better understanding of our brain and how it is able to do many things at once. John Ridley Stroop, an American psychologist researched in the area of cognition and interference. The area of psychology that the Stroop Effect is grouped in is cognition. Cognitive

In 1935, John Ridley Stroop conducted an experiment at George Peabody College for teachers in the United States. Stroop used 70 college undergraduates as subject in his experiment, he compared times for reading names of colours and naming colours themselves. The aim was to determine if the colour of the word affected the ability to read it. In the experiment, there was three different conditions. In the first condition participants were asked to read words as quickly as possible whereas participants

attribute is used in emotional Stroop. The original Stroop test was word and color congruence and incongruence (Stroop, 1935). With this experiment many more have popped up using the general guidelines of the test to create new Stroop tests. One form of Stroop is an Emotional Stroop using pictures. In a study by Russell Constantine and his colleagues, they used pictures of

Participants: In the present study, the experiment has been done at Northern Illinois University. The study had XXX students. These students could be from any year of school: freshman, sophomore, junior, senior, graduate. This study ranged from the ages of XXX – XXX years. We had females, males, and people who identified as other who had participated in the current study. In the current study we had XX males participate, XX females participate, and XX other participate. Pertaining to the current

cannot be determined because there is not an even amount of ages found in this study; there would need to be a larger sample size with a more divers, yet equal amount of ages to determine that. Another additional question was whether gender has an effect on becoming more susceptible to proactive interference with working memory cannot be determined because there is not an equal amount of genders for each age