Subjectivity

liberation from naturalistic dogmatism and realization transcendental subjectivity (Zahavi 46). Rather than leading to the abstention of the real world, this shift should be understood as the increasing development of our field of research (Zahavi 46). Bracketing demonstrates that the world appears and is made possible by subjectivity (Zahavi 52). Subjectivity must be taken into account with any attempt to understand reality; subjectivity makes appearances possible (Zahavi

History has always been commended to have elements objectivity and subjectivity, though according to Keith Windshuttle’s The Killing Of History (1994) the whole process of constructing history is somewhat subjective due to various reasons concerning the construction and overall preservation of historical documents. Jacques Barzun an American Cultural historian does somewhat agree with a portion of Windshuttle’s work in regards with the construction of history. Though Barzun does tend to disagree

elements of the supernatural, elements of the divine, and also elements of subjectivity. Sometimes, we base our most important decisions in life with subjectivity. That is, we look with our emotions and with what we feel would be the right thing for ourselves. Why do we this? I believe that although humans belong in the material world, humans can show and express some elements of the supernatural, the divine, and subjectivity. Aristotle believes that in order to determine of some action is good, we

predecessors, it shapes new modes of subjectivity and changes the way we perceive knowledge. Although these changes

The holocaust was where many nazis following hitler killed 6 million jews in concentration camps. This statement about the Holocaust was objective. Objectivity is a statement that refers or statements that are factual or measurable. There is also subjectivity which is based mostly on the author's opinion or emotions of the situation. Most of the non- fiction articles you read about the holocaust are all objective or, all subjective but, the article the holocaust, part 2: “The final solution” has

discourses, in and of themselves, are generated in a manner that circumscribe experiences of embodied masculinized athletic subjectivity vis-à-vis the rejection, perpetration, and penetration of that which is feminine or feminized. It is important to note here, that a masculine defined by the rejection of the feminine- that is the masculine as an experience of subjectivity requiring

Nearly four-hundred years later and William Shakespeare’s The Tempest is still subject to ongoing contemporary literary critique and analysis. The potential intentions of Shakespeare’s characterization and rhetoric have elicited a response from many scholars including Debra Willis, Christopher Pye, and Alden Vaughan who enter dialogue with a variety of different research from the literary arts to social sciences, to postcolonial studies. These contribute to the preexisting field of knowledge which

intentionality and subjectivity to argue that humans are not physical machines. Subjectivity is the opinions and feelings from experience that is unique to the individual. Intentionality describes how thought can be directed on a particular object. This is consciousness. These terms are what make human beings distinct from physical machines. Moreland argues that human beings are different from a physical machine because humans have a mind that uses intentionality and subjectivity. Moreland compares

Examiner’s Report for Emily Rose Barber’s PhD thesis: Female Desire and Agency in Selected Short Stories by Lorrie Moore Emily Rose Barber’s thesis includes acreative work in the form of a collection of 17 short stories: Thrill and a dissertation: Female Desire and Agency in Selected Short Stories by Lorrie Moore. The stories included in the collection, Thrill, are stories of women’s intimate relationships with men; relationships that are dysfunctional in some way, that are either over or doomed

gives rise to an emotion. I am truly liberated; I am separate from emotions; no longer tied to subjectivity. I do not feel what I see; I do not embody the thought bubbling inside of me. It’s neither cold nor is there heat. The entanglements of subjectivity have released me, leaving me in a state of weightlessness. There is no weight brought by subjectivity weighing me down. I’m not saying subjectivity is good or bad; it just simply is. I am completely objective; I’m not viewing life from any perspective