T.l.o

components to see if this is justified; was there a reasonable justification for the search, what is the thing that we may be searching for, and will there be any consequences for anyone during the search or seizure. Throughout the case of New Jersey v. T.L.O many questions arose in what was constituted as reasonable

There are two cases that are being compared; New Jersey v. T.L.O. and Safford v. Redding. The rulings in both of these cases were just. In the case New Jersey v. T.L.O. the defendant (T.L.O.) was found guilty for smoking cigarettes and for possessing drug paraphernalia in her purse. In court, her lawyer argued that the way that her purse was searched, was a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Since she was a delinquent and her rights were not, in fact, violated, she was sentenced to probation for

Accused Autumn Overstreet Liberty High School AP Government 3AB New Jersey v. T.L.O. was an important case concerning the rights of the accused and had to do with the exclusionary rule. This case furthered the knowledge of the exclusionary rule that is mentioned in the Fourth Amendment. It was decided that the exclusionary rule applies to searches and seizures that occur at school by the officials. T.L.O. was only fourteen years old when she and another girl were suspected to have been smoking

New Jersey v. T.L.O (1985) In my case overview decision, I chose New Jersey v. T.L.O (1985). This case there was a high school student who felt she was searched illegally. T.L.O. was a high school student. School officials looked through her handbag presuming she had cigarettes. The officials found cigarettes, a little measure of pot, and a paper containing the names of students who owed T.L.O. cash. T.L.O. was accused of having pot on her person in a school. Before trial, T.L.O. moved the courts

New Jersey v. T.L.O Supreme Court Case (1999), a teacher at Piscataway High School in Middlesex County, New Jersey discovered two 14-year-old freshmen smoking in a lavatory on March 7, 1980. Since smoking in the lavatory was a violation of a school rule, the teacher took the two girls to the Principal’s office, where they met with Theodore Choplick, the Assistant Vice Principal. During questioning, one girl admitted that has had violated the school rule, while the other girl, T.L.O, denied she smoked

Hazelwood School District vs. Kuleimer In May of 1983, some students in the journalism class at hazel wood high school in Missouri, made the final edition of the school newspaper. They then gave the newspaper to the adviser, Howard Emerson, who wa a newbie. He gave the principal the final review of the paper before it was published. When the principal, Reynolds, reviewed the paper, there were 2 articles that he didn’t like. The first article was about teen pregnancy, including some comments from

Have you ever felt like it was against your rights to be searched in school, that it is a violation to your fourth amendment, well it's not. According to what the Supreme Court, New Jersey v T.L.O case, school officials can search students if they believe a student has committed a crime or if the student violated a rule or policy. The only thing officials are prohibited from doing is a strip search, they have all the right to search all of your belongings and your person as long as you are on school

New Jersey v. T.L.O. The parties: The State of New Jersey and T.L.O. (a 14 year-old high school student) Case background: T.L.O. and another student were caught smoking cigarettes in a high school bathroom. Tobacco use was allowed in this high school in certain smoking areas, but was not allowed in restrooms. They were taken to the principal’s office by a teacher. T.L.O. would not admit to smoking and declared she was a non-smoker. The assistant principal took T.L.O. to his office where he searched

purse. This is what happened for T.L.O. when she was a freshman caught smoking marijuana in the bathroom and the vice principle thought that it was okay to look through her purse for proof of what she had done. They both obviously did something that was going to be seen as wrong to different people. Today we will discuss how the T.L.O. V. New Jersey court case was created, the steps that it went through and the final decision and how it still impacts lives today. The T.L.O. court case made an impact on

The first question at hand is: Do Students have the same rights as adults under the Fourth Amendment? The Supreme Court, over fifty year ago, ruled that students do not abandon their constitutional rights when they enter a school building (“The Fourth Amendment & Students,” 2008). However, students’ rights to privacy are more limited than those of adults. For adults, a search requires a warrant, probable cause, or reasonable suspicion and any that illegal evidence obtained during a search can be