terracotta warriors essay

Samurai and Knights Thousands of years ago two new, professional warriors arose. These two groups of warriors called the samurai, and knights were created around the same time even though they had no idea that the other even existed,they coexistited. These two types of soldiers were both similar and different in many ways. With all of these similarities and differences it makes us wonder which group of warriors would triumph in a battle. Based on evidence, I conclude that the samurai would win

practice from Japan, sometimes called Bushido. Samurai originally meant “one who serves”, which refers to men of noble birth. These warriors obliged by a strict code of conduct, where they practiced loyalty, courage, self-control, respect, honesty, benevolence, justice, and above all else, honor. In addition, appreciation and respect of life was essential for a true warrior. Authors of Japan saw the merit of this tradition and desired to honor its esteem. Specifically, author Ryunosuke Akutagawa honors

raked up when they were fourteen years old, but the knights became squires and the samurai in training became samurai. However, the samurai read poetry in hidden places, and they practiced Kendo and Zen Buddhism. According to Document A “The young warriors studied Kendo, the moral code of the samurai, and Zen Buddhism.” The knights learned horse skills when they were younger and how to ride a horse and pony at a young

Knights vs Samurais From time long ago knights and samurais would battle to see what kingdom was better. Feudalism was also something from long ago and, feudalism had a social hierarchy pyramid. A social hierarchy pyramid would determine if a person was wealthy or if a person was poor. Both Japan and Europe had social hierarchy pyramid and both had similar rules. Also knights and samurais would battle against each other to see who was stronger. A samurai would win a knight in battle because knights

Knights are the European warriors that go into battle to protect their kingdom. Meanwhile, samurai defend and protect Japan and its people. If the two warriors were to go to battle or war, I think that a samurai would win. While knights and samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai t=and this can be seen in the samurai code, armor/training, and training. The first way that samurais have an advantage is because of their armor. In document D written

Are Samurai and knights similarities greater than their differences? Taija Jones 6th Are there more differences or similarities when it comes to knights and samurais? From samurais being actual leaders in a social pyramid to knights almost being at the bottom of theirs. The government loss control so it led to feudalism. Which is a social system drawn as a pyramid. In the feudal system in both europe and japan nobles gave loyalty and military services. In Japan the military system was established

Japanese samurai were warriors of the shogun rulers throughout feudal times. The Samurai Were Japanese warrior noblemen. They dominated Japan from the 10th throughout the 19th century. They are Comparable to a Japanese version of European medieval knights. The samurai were impressive fighters in combat and were powerful. In the 8th century, Japan's government sent warriors to control barbarians in northern Honshu. The government depended allot on these warriors. The name samurai which is ('those

The Japanese Samurai and Medieval Knights are very similar, on many levels. They both have a Code of Conduct, similar training techniques and they both play a vital role in the feudal system. They also have a few differences, their armour and their weapons; when everything is taken into consideration, they are more similar than they are different. There were many similarities and differences between the Japanese samurais and the medieval knights training, amour and codes of conduct. The medieval

Do you believe the Samurai and Knights had more similarities or differences? The samurai and knights are two societies that lived halfway around the world from each other. They lived about 1,000 years ago. The samurai lived in Japan and the knights lived in Europe. They both faced many problems throughout the war. Critics would argue that the samurai and knights had more similarities than differences. However, they actually had more differences than similarities. The knights and samurai had many

out of the shadows clad in lightweight armour & carrying a katana. This is a samurai, & while the scenario presented very likely never occured, knights & samurai certainly existed. From 1000 to 1600, these two different but astonishingly similar warriors lived in continents next to one another but not the same. They both developed at around the same time frame, & has extremely similar systems- two forms of feudalism, the most prevalent system in the medieval world (OI). Samurai has the daimyo, &