The Return of the Native

readings and class discussions, one of the difficult decisions that museums have to make is do they return their objects/artifacts back to their original countries or cultural group. This issue is an ethical dilemma because, would it be the museum to legally keep the objects because of their belief that they can protect and use these items (Warren 1999: 1-20). Or, would it be ethical for the museum to return the items that were previously removed from their country or place of origin. Based on my lecture

area. They built a village, and after some time, Grenville decided to return to England for more food and supplies, but he left behind a few people to maintain the village that were built. He promised to return shortly with more food and supplies, however, after several years, with no sign of Grenville, the villagers were ready to leave the New World. It was during this time that Sir Francis Drake stopped by the village on his return trip from a successful raid in the Caribbean, he offered to take the

means of grave robbing. Native Americans wanted justice for these past mistreatments and control over their history. According to Chip Colwell, campaigning, repatriation of indigenous artifacts began in the 1960s by indigenous activism. Finally, on November 16, 1990, The United States Government passed The Native American Graves Protection and Reparation Act. NAGPRA summarizes that museums must conduct an inventory of all native American cultural artifacts and remains. (Native) In addition, Museums

in the 1700s and destroyed the lives of Native Americans, and yet their culture remained principled with a high level of respect and honor. This is shown in a meeting that was held by the six nations of the Iroquois, where Chief Red Jacket gave a speech on the Native Americans view on missionary stations that the Europeans wanted to set up. Red Jacket explained their past with the first settlers, “We gave them corn and meat; they gave us poison in return” (1). These first Europeans set the tone

and traditions. Homeland is a place one can call home, whether it is a person’s native land or a place where anyone can feel safe, happy and welcome. In an immigrant’s perspective, on the other hand, they have a hard time calling home “home.” Laviera a famous Nuyorican poet, decribed his battle in the poem “NUyorican.” He points out the idea that immigrants migrate elsewhere to find economic stability and later return to their hometown and encounter feelings of isolation and exclusion. Laveira states

Following the end of World War II, Native American soldiers returning from the war found themselves returning to a situation in which they were treated as second-class citizens in their own country despite their impactful contributions to the war effort. The era that followed would continue to illustrate some of the issues that plagued the relationship between the government and Native American communities, which, in turn, was destructive to the aims at improving the lives of those that lived in

percent less than the Canadian natives. After adding the characteristics about gender, immigration years, work experience, education, language skill, family factors, industry, occupation and provinces in column (2), I find that the wage differential widens to 50.8 percent lead to an increase of 40.8 percent when controlling other characteristics. These considerable changes arise mainly from the inclusion of variables that affect the wage gap between immigrants and natives. For example, immigrants accumulating

These effects include: wages return to the original level, the capital return falls, and the immigration surplus dissipates. This can be referred to as the long-run impact of immigration because the money answers with lag when there is unanticipated immigration. However, even if the immigrants arrive in the United States without capital, investment and domestic savings will rise due to the higher return on capital. When the capital-labor ratio returns to normal, the immigration surplus and

ignored beliefs and cultures of American Indians. It should be recognized that some who study these topics are well-intentioned, but they are a minority. These seemingly harmless fields of study are actually the culprits behind the destruction of Native American Under the guise of historically beneficial actions, archaeologists excavated skeletons at an alarming rate. In the name of science, archaeologists dug up hundreds of thousands of bodies in the last three centuries. The exact number will

Philip Amadas and Arthur Barlowe to the new world to find a settlement location for colonist settlement. They arrived in the New World on 4 July 1584 and established a good relationship with the natives. Earning the trust of the native, Amadas and Barlowe returned back to England in 1585 with two natives – Manteo and Wanchese. Manteo was the chief of the Croatoan tribe and Wanchese was from Roanoke; both speak Algonquian. The explorers had good and exciting news to report of the wonders of the New