The Singularity Is Near

The Singularity is Near: Book Response The Singularity is Near was written by Ray Kurzweil in 2005. Kurzweil looks into the near future and confidently predicts where we, as a species, will find ourselves. The Singularity is a future period at which artificial intelligence will match and exceed the intelligence of humans, including the problem-solving skills, pattern recognition, even emotional and moral intelligence of the human brain. We will reach this point relatively soon. Kurzweil estimates

daily life of human beings has become a habitual attribute. Humans have incorporated technology into every facet of their lives to maintain an easy lifestyle and even improve the quality of their health. In Ray Kurzweil’s ingenious novel “The Singularity is Near”, Kurzweil depicts an era when there will be profound contingencies that will alter the entire future of human biology and the generations to come. One of Kurzweil’s greatest implications is the life changing effect that technology will have

Allen, Paul G., and Mark Greaves. "The Singularity Isn't Near." MIT Technology Review 12 Oct. 2011: n. pag. Rpt. in Robotic Technology. Ed. Louise Gerdes. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven, 2014. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 7 Oct. 2015. . John Bell, James. "Nanotechnology Will Contribute to a "Singularity"" Nanotechnology. Ed. Jacqueline Langwith. Detroit: Greenhaven, 2010. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. of "Exploring the Singularity." Futurist 1 June 2003: n. pag. Opposing

In Paul Allen’s article, “the singularity isn’t near”, he claims that smart machines will surpass human intelligence but not in the near future. He states that in order to achieve singularity it isn’t enough to just increase the rate of software. “The returns, such as a chip speed and cost-effectiveness, also increase exponentially. Within a few decades, machines intelligence will surpass human intelligence, leading to The Singularity” (Kurzweil march 2001, 2). Allen disagrees with Kurzweil notion

This paper addresses the controversies surrounding technological singularity, whether it is a possibility in the future or simply an overly ambitious/grandiloquent idea/fiction. The topic has been a household debate specially since the recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (i.e. Google’s prototype for driverless cars). On one hand, Artificial Intelligence (AI) enthusiasts and optimists suggest that technological singularity (TS) is inevitable, owing to the emulation of the human mind. They also

the point where it has become infinitely dense and infinitely small - the singularity of a black hole. A black hole consists of two main parts, a singularity and an event horizon. The event horizon is like the "skin" of a black hole, once you pass the event horizon there is no escape. The horizon is often referred to as the clothes of the black hole, as it is a barrier that separates the singularity from the rest of the universe. The event horizon can be seen by rays of

spacetime how to curve and curved spacetime tells matter how to behave"(Kaufmann 70). In other words, all matter has gravitational fields, gravity curves spacetime, and objects move on the shortest path through curved spacetime. A beam of light passing near the surface of the sun is deflected from its normal path because the space it traveled through is warped by the gravitational fields. Gravity causes time to slow down. It is impossible to directly observe the slowing of time because ones heartbeat

Support The Frightfully Hopeful Future of Technological Singularity Imagine. One day your Doctor regretfully informs you the person you love the most in your life is tragically going pass away due to an incurable disease. Instantly, overwhelming feelings of despair and anger burn inside your chest while graphic scenes of funeral details and goodbyes flood your mind eventually propelling you to the rhetorical question everyone asks, “Is there anything we can do?” Then, The Doctor hands you a pamphlet

In the book of Exodus of the Old Testament of the Judeo-Christian Bible, Moses asked God for His Name, and God responded “I Am that I Am”, which, in Hebrew is “Yahweh” and in Greek it is “Oh Ohn” which literally translates as “The One That Exists”. The Cosmological Argument attempts to prove that God exists by showing that there cannot be an infinite number of regressions of causes to things that exist. It states that there must be a final uncaused-cause of all things. This uncaused-cause is asserted

at a few hundred kilometers per second or neutrons near light speed is almost irrelevant. How fine-grained the kinetic energy is makes just a minuscule difference. The human is dead anyway. Electromagnetic radiation. The particle aspect of photons aside, this has an entirely different quality than kinetic energy above. Being slow-cooked to death is decidedly more unpleasant than just being blown to smithereens. And then there are singularities. If whatever happens to a human makes it impossible