Theodicy

existence of a God is impossible and inconsistent with the presence of evil, while the evidential variation aims at not so much proving that the existence of God and evil is impossible, but simply improbable. Philosophers throughout history created theodicies and posed explanations in ways that may have been formulated according to particular historical eras and beliefs. Epicurus, a Greek Philosopher who lived between 341 B.C.E. and 271-270 B.C.E., questioned the godly characteristics while considering

The Evidential Problem of Evil was first raised by the contemporary American philosopher William Leonard Rowe. Unlike the Logical Problem of Evil, the argument claims that it’s not the mere existence of evil that is problematic to the theistic world but it is the amount of pointless and useless evil that poses a threat to God’s existence. Before delving into Rowe’s argument, it is necessary to clarify some of the terms used. The term “God” refers to a divine entity that is all-good, all-knowing,

The Purpose of Evil in the Bible        God looked at everything He had made, and it was very good (Genesis 1:31)    Five times in Genesis 1, God looks at that which He has created, and pronounces it "good". Then on the sixth day He creates Man, and says that His creation is now "very good". God's pronouncement of His creation, which would be everything around us and includes ourselves, as "very good" is hard to reconcile with that which we see on a daily basis -- a reality in which we experience

The problem of evil and suffering has been around for the thousands of years. It remains an expressive debate today as it is used as one of the main arguments by Atheists to state that God does not exist. It is said that the nature of God can be explained in three ways that God is omnipotent which means that he is all powerful, that God is omniscient which means he is all knowing and omnibenevolent which means that god is all loving. These statements cannot be true because evil exists in this world

Hick gives readers an Irenaeus theodicy rather than and Augustinian theodicy (Hick 120). Hick begins his piece by addressing that human suffering and evil is the most effectual doubt to the belief God (Hick 120). The idea of a loving God seems too good to be true, and impossible given the hardship seen in

There are many people who believe that God is all knowing, all-powerful and all loving. These people never ask why is there so much evil in the world in fear of testing their faith to God. Moral and natural evil are kinds of evil that we see in the world but have no explanation as to why God would allow these to happen. J.L. Mackie claims that any explanation for how evil can exist with the onmimax God has many faults and because of this the “omnimax” is only fictional. By defining and identifying

The problem of evil is the notion that, how can an all-good, all-powerful, all-loving God exists when evil seems to exist also. The problem of evil also gives way to the notion that if hell exists then God must be evil for sending anyone there. I believe both of these ideas that God can exist while there is evil and God is not evil for sending anyone to hell. I believe hell exists in light of the idea that God is holy and just. The larger is how anyone can go to heaven. I will try to answer the problem

The problem of evil explores whether the existence of God is compatible with the existence of evil. An atheist will often suggest that the existence of evil proves the nonexistence of God. If God existed and were omniscient and omnipotent, He would be able to know of evil and prevent its occurrence. As he is perfectly good He would prevent evil, and evil would therefore not exist. If God truly exists, evil should not. There is a chapter in The Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoevsky called The Grand

actually modified or destroyed the faith of many of the survivors. One of the explanations usually offered, is that through pain and suffering, vital life lessons can be ascertained. Mark Stephen Murray Scott seems to echo this thought in his work, Theodicy at the margins: New trajectories for the problem of evil. Mark Stephen Murray Scott states (2011), "Since Christ was the ultimate victim of oppression, he identifies with those who suffer from victimization." (p. 151) He discusses how when we embrace

being is not actually, all good, all knowing and all powerful. (maybe delete/change highlighted part). If evil exists then how can an omni-natured being exist? (find reference). There are numerous theodicies that argue otherwise, for example, the free will argument and John Hick's soul-making theodicy. However, the problem of evil is still too significant to ignore. (find references). The logical problem of evil