Third Crusade

The Crusades were European Christians who wanted to take back Jerusalem. The Crusades killed many people along the way. Which leads us to a question. Were the results of the Crusades more positive or Negative? I believe it was more negative because killing people was never always the way to go. Although the crusades did have a world impact, their legacy will forever be the same. One reason that it is a negative result is that they are the negative result in their legacy between the Muslims

The Crusades were battles between European Christians and Muslims. Now, the Crusades caused many things, both good and bad. But the question is, were the effects of the Crusades more positive or negative? From what I can tell, most of the results of the Crusades were negative ones. To begin, the Crusades have caused a lot of hate towards these religions. In Document Five it says that Christians and Muslims have an inherited hatred towards one another. This is important for the reason being that

The Fourth to Sixth Crusade The Fourth Crusade began in 1198, due to conflict for controls for power between Europe and Byzantium. This changed the Crusader’s mission of reclaiming Jerusalem from Egypt's command, to overthrow Alexius IV, whose attempts to submit the Byzantine Church to Rome was met with hostility in 1204. While he was placed in palace coup, war was waged on Constantinople, with the Fourth Crusade ending with the subjugation and ransacking of the Byzantine capital later that year

The First Crusade played a very big part in the Medieval England. Christians wanted to recapture Jerusalem from the Muslims, but the Muslims made Christian life hard so they could not take Jerusalem from them. The First Crusade has a long history and there were many leaders which Raymond and Godfrey were two of them. For almost 200 years during the Middle Ages, Christian Crusades wrested control of the Palestine region from the Seljuk Turks, due to a series of military attacks that were

be known as the Crusades. Many people have wondered were the results of the Crusades more positive or negative? The results of the Crusades were more negative because they would massacre communities and empires, and they had very low patience. One reason I think Crusades are more negative is that they would massacre innocent people. Document 1 states that “In Europe, Crusaders sometimes turned their fury against Jews, massacring communities.” This is relevant because the crusades put a bitter legacy

went in expeditions called the Crusades. People decided to go on the crusades for many different reasons. People may have gone because they wanted an adventure, or to to prove their bravery. Kings also encouraged violent knights to go on crusades to get rid of them. But the most important reasons to go on the crusades were probably to take jerusalem from the turks, to be forgiven of sins, and for younger sons to get land of their own. L. The main reason the crusades started was to take Jerusalem

The actions and behavior of the crusaders were guided more by secular reasons than religious. While the crusades have been remembered as a purely religious struggle between Latin Christendom and the Muslims of the middle east the actions made by the crusaders were only partly caused by religion. In addition although there were many members of the First Crusade who were genuinely motivated by religious devotion there were many who were not. The actions of crusaders like Bohemond of Taranto and Baldwin

Many of the Crusaders goals were to reconquer the Holy Land from the infidels and then go home once the job was finished. With this being the case with many of the crusaders, this left Jerusalem empty and vulnerable to be reconquered by the enemy. This then lead to the people who decided to stay in the Holy Land to fear the idea of being captured and possibly killed. The fear of this forced the leader of Jerusalem to send out word he needed more people to populate the city. Sending out this message

The Crusades were a sequence of religious wars fought between 1096 and 1291 for control of the Holy Land. Pope Urban II initiated the First Crusade (1096–1102) in order to aid the Christian Byzantine Empire, which was under attack by Muslim Seljuk Turks. The Crusades had a lasting impact on European and Middle Eastern culture and politics that still continues to this day. The Crusades was aimed to the people western Christians, poor and rich, to come and help people in east to aid them and

"Crusade," The word itself almost leaves a foul taste in a Christians mouth as they look back at those dark times in the Church's history. The Crusades are not a "dark time" in the Church's history. It is a time full of historical significance and it constantly gets overlooked and seen as a mistake. Perhaps, however, it is not a mistake, one could make a case for the Crusaders that they were only trying to protect the relics and sites they saw as holy. One thing that many Christians do not understand