Tribunals

seller suspended delivery of the goods claiming advance payment, whereas, the buyer requested for avoidance of the contract due to non-delivery. The tribunal held that, advance payment should not be a ground to suspend delivery, therefore, confirmed the request of the buyer to avoid the contract. Similar view has been held by an arbitration tribunal in China whereby, failure of the seller to

Military tribunals have long been a controversial subject since most are created through Military Orders, which have been considered to be undermining the constitutional principle of separation of powers. For instance Bush Order instructed the Secretary of Defence to secure custody of anyone the President lists as subject to the Order. While the constitution requires, at an absolute minimum, that: (1) offences be characterised ahead of time by a positive legislation; (2) the legal branch be interested

Brussels I Regulation, where stipulates the exclusive jurisdiction for the designated court in the choice-of-court agreement . III. MUTUAL TRUST AND RELATED CASES IN RESPECT OF THE BRUSSELS I RECAST The notion of mutual trust has been used by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for explaining the important role of mutual recognition in the Brussels I Regulation in order to require the courts of Member States to comply jurisdiction rules on staying proceedings and declining jurisdiction . This part

1a) Directives and Regulations are forms of secondary EU legislation. Directives are binding and lay down results to be achieved by the Member States. However it is up to each Member State to create or adapt their legislations to meet the requirements by the specified date in the Directive. Regulations are binding legislative Acts which are directly enforceable in all Member States and are applied in full. The Regulation will specify a date in which it will be enforced (The Open University (OU)

important figures indicted by the tribunal. Created in 1993 by the UN Security Council, the Yugoslavia tribunal ultimately indicted 161 people and sentenced 83 of them. The tribunal's biggest failure was its inability to convince people in the former Yugoslavia that it was impartial. Mirko Klarin, a journalist who urged the court's creation in an article in 1991, says one success was expanding the definition of war crimes. The suspicion that war-crimes tribunals are an alien imposition also afflicts

The arrest and trial of enemy combatants by military tribunal poses no significant moral issues. It is military order to detain those accused of international terrorism. Every country has their own guidelines and regulations when it comes to punishments, the U.S. punishments could be worse. Overall, the American government has and will try to do all that is necessary in order to protect all Americans. As of 2001, a new order in war was presented. The United States Constitution allows Congress the

It is sad when the Appeals Court Judges Violated Ethics Laws, Report Says according to Sam Hananel in the Huffington Post on April 28,2014. The Center for Public Integrity released a report Monday that found twenty-four cases in which judges ruled on the case despite owning stock in the company appearing before them. Also in another two cases the judges where financially tied to the law firms representing the parties. When the judges found out sixteen of them sent out letters to the parties involved

Clark & Ors v Gandangara Local Aboriginal Land Council (Tenancy) [2011] NSWCTTT 526 (10 November 2011) CONSUMER, TRADER AND TENANCY TRIBUNAL Tenancy Division APPLICATIONS NOS:|RT 11/04274 (Clark)RT 11/04285 (Thatcher)RT 11/05207 (Nixon)RT 11/05549 (Howarth)RT 11/06433 (Campbell)RT 11/07932 (Beale)| APPLICANTS:|Synthia Maree ClarkAnn ThatcherRonald NixonRonald HowarthCecelia Ann CampbellPeter Michael Beale| RESPONDENTS:|Gandangara Local Aboriginal Land Council (“Gandangara”)| HEARING:|Liverpool

Cases and disputes are evaluated and resolved in courts or tribunals everywhere across the world every day. Out of all these cases, it is the rarer cases involving sports disputes that provide some of the more intriguing and interesting cases that should be studied in order to get a better grasp on the effectiveness of both tribunals and courts as well as how they balance the rights of the player and the rights of others affected. The extent of these sports disputes can often range from minor things

understand that tribunal decision that tends to uphold statutory intentions, including protection of the public interest, require greater respect during the review. This means that the reviewing courts should show deference to a significant extent to tribunals during cases of such kinds (Boyd 279). Likewise, in its review, the court should consider the technical aspects involved in the decision-making process by the tribunal in question (Boyd 267). It can be fairly said that the tribunals might be better