U.S. Supreme Court Case On Police Misconduct Essay

convictions occur when innocent defendants are found guilty in criminal trials or when defendants feel obligated to take a plea agreement in order to avoid extremely long sentences or the death penalty. The term wrongful conviction can also refer to cases in which a jury finds a person with a good defense guilty or where the conviction is reversed in violation of the defendants constitutional rights. The term actual or factual innocence is used to refer to persons who did not commit the crime. Miscarriage

The plain view doctrine is an exception to the search warrant requirements that allows police officers to seize evidence, without a search warrant, that they recognize as contraband or used in a criminal activity that is seen in plain view without having to enter the property or perform a search. In addition, a corollary to the plain sight doctrine is the plain smell doctrine, that allows if an officer smells evidence (e.g. marijuana), the officer meets the probable cause requirement to initiate

People For The Ethical Treatment Of Animals (PETA) is a non-profit animal activist group that focuses explicitly on exposing animal brutality and ensuring the safety of all animals. PETA promises to protect animals from misconduct, abuse, brutality, and inhumane slaughtering. The activist group’s official motto is, ‘’ Animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, use for entertainment, or abuse in any other way’’(PETA). This motto officially means that animals are not ours to use or cause

and legitimacy in their day-to-day operations. Being lawful refers to being compliant with established requirements of the law and harmonizing with state and federal statutes and court decisions. Furthermore, legitimacy in law enforcement is the public’s belief about an agency and their willingness to recognize their police authority (National Institute of Justice, 1999). Perceptions Our society bases many of the problems on the perceptions they have about the lawfulness and legitimacy of their local

investigation stage of a criminal accusation that could avoid a trial altogether. When this occurs it is known as prosecutorial misconduct. Often times this behavior will occur when a state prosecutor may want to advance their career. The responsible parties who should report this type of misconduct are judges and defense attorneys. What’s more, when prosecutors commit this misconduct, they are protected under absolute immunity which makes it hard to hold them civilly accountable for their

closely associated with the Warrant Requirement’s proscription of police inquiries into same; and, 4) the exclusionary rule, which presumptively excludes any information or evidence gathered in violation of the preceding two (Rickless, 2005). • The Court has continued to delineate areas, which fall outside the parameters of the restrictions placed upon government officials through the Fourth Amendment. • The Court has ruled that the areas carved out which include exceptions

Annotated Bibliography #3 .gov Working Research Question:     Should the U.S. Judical branch take action to prevent wrongful convictions and improve police investigations, or should the government spend its time and resources on other things? Bibliographic Entry:  LaPorte, G. Wrongful Convictions and DNA Exonerations: Understanding the Role of Forensic Science. Retrieved September 24, 2017, from https://www.nij.gov/journals/279/Pages/wrongful-convictions-and-dna-exonerations.aspx Source Summary:

violations of constitutional rights by police and prosecutors. A number of studies and testimonies by police officers support this contention. 2. It manifests society’s refusal to convict lawbreakers by relying on official lawlessness—a clear demonstration of our commitment to the rule of law that states that no person, not even a law enforcement official, is above the law. 3. It results in the freeing of the guilty in a relatively small proportion of cases. A 1978 study by the General Accounting

Running Head: SHOULD POLICE OFFIERS WHO LIE BE TERMINATED AS A MATTER OF PUBLIC POLICY Should Police Officers who lie be terminated as a matter of Public Policy LaKetha Southern CJUS 530 Liberty University Professor Jerry Wells 06/29/2015 SHOULD POLICE OFFICERS WHO LIE BE TERMINATED AS A MATTER OF PUBLIC POLICY With all the recent issues that are currently seeing on the news from the Travon Martin Case, Michael Brown in Ferguson, Corruption in Law Enforcement there really needs to be

''The tendency of those who execute the criminal laws of the country to obtain convictions by means of unlawful searches and enforced confessions . . . should find no sanction in the judgment of the courts which are charged at all times with the support of the Constitution and to which people of all conditions have a right to appeal for the maintenance of such fundamental rights.'' [9] The ruling vaguely had a base as a presumption that the allowance