Unjust Laws Essay

The necessary qualities of a good democratic citizen require an individual to recognize an injustice within the law, actively oppose that law, and to do so regardless if that unjust law affects the citizen personally. Rousseau, Emerson, and Douglass all agree that freedom and equality are natural rights endowed to all humans. However the three authors diverge in consensus when envisioning the necessary qualities of a good democratic citizen, such as the position from which each author is theorizing

(a lot)(insert different word) of death. But both follow the laws they feel are morally just, rather than the laws of the land and both receive punishment for their actions. Fighting for injustice, this is the major similarity between Dr. King and Antigone. Both of their civil disobedience steamed from their motivation to act on moral laws instead of the laws of the land. Antigone was willing to go as far as death to follow the law of the Gods, and Martin Luther King went to jail for his unlawful

is allowed to run rampant under the hand of a government, and when the society in which these tyrannical laws or policies exist has determined it is unjust to combat said laws peacefully then it is accepted the only outcomes are brutality and suffering for those affected. Civil disobedience as it was used in the mid-1950s civil rights movement or the 1930s by Gandhi and the breaking of salt laws is the only acceptable definition civil disobedience. In today's world of protesting regarding looting and

overpowering shooting of an eighteen year old boy. However, this shooting was done by an officer of the law. We must decide what is just within this very extreme case that is being tried. On one hand we see that an unarmed eighteen year old boy was shot and killed in the middle of the street on that dreadful August 9th. However, on the other hand we see that the shooter was an officer of the law and someone that we have put our trust into to create a better sense of

our law enforcement departments threatens our reliability in the members of the law enforcement community. In a society where we rely on law and order to protect our rights and liberties, we depend heavily on those appointed to enforce the law in a just manner. The unwillingness of a person in uniform to intervene in the name of justice undermines the expectations of its community members. It will also diminish the progress of an ever-developing and ever-changing society. It is an unjust act

have to do with the law?” Is justice an inherent component within law or is it a moral judgement about law? In attempting to answer this question, we will examine the debate between H.L.A. Hart and Lon L. Fuller. The argument put forth by Hart focuses on law as it is; while Fuller’s response focuses largely on law as it should be. At its core, this debate concerns the separability of law and morality, with Hart pushing a positivist narrative and Fuller promoting natural law. Both philosophers put

Martin Luther King Jr. is an activist and leader of the Civil Rights Movement, he fought to end racial segregation and racial discrimination through nonviolent means. In the 1930’s Martin Luther King Jr. was thrown into jail during the protest of Alabama Christian Movement of Human Rights, where colored people peacefully protested for their rights. He then wrote a letter, “Letter from Birmingham Jail” why he has been placed in Birmingham Jail and why it is wrong that peaceful colored protesters were

In Dr. Martin Luther King Jr’s Letter from the Birmingham Jail, he argues that segregation is inhumane and is hurting the American society as a whole. All the time and energy that goes into segregation is slowing down the American society’s progress to succeed as a nation. He uses several rhetoric strategies that help adopt a tone that is both personal and logical. King was able to incorporate the rhetoric triangle into his letter and still managed to address his arguments. While using pathos, ethos

considers behaviors of such, are unjust and unethical, that are not permitted in the United States. When terminating an employee, it is justifiable the proper grounds for termination. Terminating employees should not be bias but based off an employee’s performance, capabilities, and complying with companies’ rules and regulations. Wrongful Termination Law and “Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures”, is improvised to protect employees from any unjust dismissals by an employer, According

4 Michael Huemer: “America’s Unjust Drug War” In the essay “America’s Unjust Drug War” by Michael Huemer, Huemer discusses the facts and opinions around the subject on whether or not the recreational use of drugs should be banned by law. Huemer believes that the American government should not prohibit the use of drugs. He brings up the point on drugs and how they harm the users and the people in the user’s life; he proves that the prohibition on drugs in unjust. Huemer believes that drug prohibition