Upper house

Is an upper house of parliament the vital missing piece of democracy in Queensland or an expensive, extra layer of red tape? Good afternoon, fellow classmates and Mrs Bruce, I am here today to talk to you about how an upper house in Queensland is crucial for the success of our justice system, how it is needed to enforce protocol on governments and required to give Queensland the same accountability as every other federal and state parliament. Australian parliament has a two houses; The House of Representatives

other country upper house configurations. Those countries have shown working alternative ways of how to separate powers over the legislative bodies. The Federal Republic of Germany has an alternative approach to federalism which differs to that of Canada and so does the United States of America. Those two countries have been very successful with their unique forms of parliament and offer an alternative structure to what Canada currently has. The history of the formation of upper houses in certain countries

It is very evident that Queensland does not have to reinstate an upper house to be an effect government. This is due to that the original upper house was unable to do its job effectively of reviewing and negotiating laws and bills. Especially amending money bills that the lower house passed, due to that its members came from elitist group of wealth and education (Queensland Parliament, 2010). This elitist upper house resulted in a lacked of diversity, therefore laws that where made for working

1 Italy will be hosting a “Renzi-fied” constitutional referendum this upcoming 4th of December and expect their voters to decide whether they approve of altering the constitution to restructure the legislative process by effectively reducing the upper chamber’s power. Constitutional reform, with an exact motive to deprive the Senate of power, has been a desired goal since WW2. Italy’s political and economic on-going crisis has incentivized the Parliament to implement new enactments-and thus far

Throughout the film Mr. Smith Goes to Washington the main character, Mr. Smith, shows his unfaltering patriotism and devotion toward being an honest man, promoting liberty and freedom. The politicians in the film seem to be the exact opposite of Mr. Smith because they forget that everything is about the people and doing what is right. Many politicians today share both the qualities of Mr. Smith as well as the other politicians, which could be improved. The story begins with a man named Sam Folley

constituent territorial units while power is undivided on central government in unicameral legislatives system . Merits of unicameral legislatures includes the ability to enact proposed legislation speedily because double consideration of measures by two houses is unessential as there is only one body needed to adopt the legislation . In other words , it is a simpler form of government . Besides , if legislation fails to pass or if citizens interests are neglected , legislators cannot criticize the other

The legislative branch of the Canadian government is divided between an upper house, the Senate, and a lower house, the House of Commons. This system is known as a bicameral legislature, and is a feature of many governments. In Canada, much of the legislative and executive power lies in the House of Commons, and by extension the Prime Minister. The Senate, however, exists in its current form primarily for the purpose of legislative review. Despite the Senate’s seemingly negligible role, or perhaps

you’re mistaken. Under our present governance, we have two houses, the House of Commons, and the Senate, the reform to the latter being the main topic of

Canadian Senate’s initial purpose is to review legislative proposals that are sent from the House of Commons, in other words to serve as a chamber of “sober second thought”(Malcolmson,Richard,Gerald,Thomas .138) The Senate is known to have statutory power to defeat, stall or pass bills that are sent from the lower house. The intention behind this function was a response to the democratically elected House of Commons that may possibly fail to respect property rights regarding people of lower and higher

The prospect for change in the House of lords has been an endless debate in British politics. The structure of the Chamber has bought about a significant argument for a transformative change in its composition. The upper chamber has already experienced some reformations over the last 100 years, including the Life Peerages Act (1958) and the Lords Act of 1999. The Lords Act reduced the number of hereditary peers to 92 members. This was seen as a significant amendment but academics claim a greater