Vote for Change

I am planning to persuade my audience to support to change the presidential election system in the U.S during my persuasive speech. In my opinion, the presidential election is the most important election in our country since it elects the leader for at least 4 years. I think it is extremely important to make sure the election system is fair and can represent the majority of our country. However, the election system that we are using right now can not always represent the majority. It does not assure

The Electoral College should stay the same because if neither of the candidates win the electoral votes the House of Representatives are able to select the new President. Therefore each state is allowed to choose who they want for President although if the candidate does not get 270 electoral votes the House of Representatives decide who the next President will be. Although the question is if the Electoral College should stay the same, be abolished, or be changed. However, keeping the Electoral College

even the U.S government and the political system. Changes can always be made, one of the changes that should be made is, the governments could improve things by pushing more information to constituents, entering into strategic partnerships with industry more easily and cooperating more broadly for the betterment of society, to name a few things. It has been said often that government is behind industry in many ways, that the public sector needs to change, and for a handful of government officials, industry

percent, and lifetime score is 7 percent. Since he was elected in 2010 and has served as Representative, the highest score he got is 14 percent in 2011. He mostly votes for anti-environment position. Among his votes for “climate-change” issues, I focus on three issues. First, I am going to consider the issue, “impacts of climate change”, voted in 2014. This is an offer for an amendment to the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriation Act. This act is to prohibits federal agencies

sensible adjustments to elections by, for example, encouraging people to vote electronically in order to discourage fraud but shouldn 't change much else other than that. I will also evaluate the other viewpoints and why I do not believe these viewpoints are the key to making UK elections fairer and more just . As of now, the UK uses the first-past-the-post system in their elections; this means that the candidate with the most votes becomes the MP for their constituency. One sensible adjustment that

For as long as I can remember, the age at which one should be able to vote has been a very controversial debate. With the upcoming presidential election on the horizon, we once again see a surge in the push back of the legal voting age. As of July 1971, the 26th amendment, has been enforced. In the article, Leave the Voting Age Alone, it states that the 26th amendment “establishes 18 as the minimum voting age for both state and federal elections” (Cheng). Previously the voting age was set at 21,

reformation as an issue for which they voted for (Liberal Party of Canada 2015). It has become clear that Canadians want change in the way they elect their government. The current Canadian electoral system is in dire need of reform to better represent voters, increase voter turnout, and discourage strategic voting. The Canadian government

much more now that Trump has won the presidency and Hilary has over two million popular votes. Senator Bernie Sanders is calling for a change like many people in the Trump protests. Others, like Barbara Boxer, want it gone. However, we can’t just get rid of the Electoral College. It was set up in the constitution by the Founding Fathers and would be difficult to revoke it. The only thing we really can do is change how the system works and try to and prevent another victory like this in future elections

To change the constitution many changes may happen it get everyone's opinions. Many of these changes may not work as is it very hard to change the constitution.The people who fund companies, made the change process very hard because they wanted to lock in the political deals that made approval of the Constitution possible. The public vote is held between two and six months after the Bill is passed by Parliament. A majority of people who vote nationwide, plus a majority of people who vote in a

voting/tactical voting, thus, the mentality of a ‘wasted vote’ is no longer an issue, which plagues the SMP system and is a focal point to why voter turnouts are so low. Essentially, all the disadvantages associated with the SMP system would be fixed by switching to the AV system. Even though the system would seem fixed, in regards to the electorates, here are cons that arise with the alterative voting system. The first disadvantage that arises from the AV system is that it is not a proportional