Whig

candidates. The Whig Party’s stance and opposition to the admission of slave-owning states such as Texas into the Union was part of the problem they had getting any support out of Texas. One has to remember that Texas is a state where Juneteenth is celebrated; a historically holiday where slaves were told that they had been declared free men and women two years AFTER the Emancipation Proclamation was in effect. With that being said, Texas wasn’t keen on some of the stances from said Whig Party. The

due to the issue of slavery. The Whig Party, which was organized in 1834, had split over the issue of slavery in 1852 once General Winfield Scott became the Whig nominee for president. Scott owed his nomination to the Northern whigs who opposed the Fugitive Slave Act and gave only lukewarm support to the Compromise of 1850. However, many Southern Whigs backed the Compromise of 1850 in order to appear both proslavery and pro-Union. Because of Scott’s position, the Whig vote in the south fell from 50

people worldwide. Webster and President Andrew Jackson joined forces in 1833 to try to change South Carolina's attempt to nullify the tariff, but Webster and the Whigs battled him on other issues including his attack on the National Bank. Webster ran for the presidency in the election of 1836 as one of the three Whig candidates, but he mostly only Massachusetts voted for him so he lost badly because no one else voted for him. For the rest of his career he tried very hard to get to the

sent “four candidates to presidency.” Consequently, by 1824, the group began to divide four different ways due to the “lack of a cohesive center.” Members of this party either joined the Democratic party forming under Andrew Jackson, or joined the Whig party, which would eventually become the Republican

The National-Republican Party arose when the Democratic-Republican Party split during John Quincy Adam's presidency from 1825 to 1829. The split pitted the party against the followers of Andrew Jackson. During this time other groups formed the Whig Party. Andrew Jackson was elected president in 1828. Most historians regard the campaign organization of Jackson as the beginning of today's Democratic Party. Jackson and his followers were known as Democrats by about 1830. The Democratic Party

Democratic Party. By the election of 1836 the National Republicans and other anti-Jacksonians had merged to form a new party, the Whigs. They lost to the Democrats that year, but in 1840 they succeeded in getting William Henry Harrison elected President. In 1844 the Whig candidate, Henry Clay, lost to James Polk, but in the next election Zachary Taylor won for the Whigs. This seemed to be a time of uncertainty in political direction. While this uncertainty was taking place, a social force greater

and Republican, they all have contributed to the breakup of the Union and mostly through the issue of slavery. The Know Nothing party is founded in 1850 and their main issue was over immigrants and Catholics since the group is mainly conservative whigs who were overwhelmed by the immigrant increase.

government. The Second American Party System was between the Democrats and the Whigs. The Whigs were organized to oppose Andrew Jackson in the early 1830s. The Whigs were the heir to Federalism, favoring a strong national government in the economy like the American System and supported active social reform. Its power was in the North and Old Northwest, voters who would benefit from increased commercialization. The Whigs wanted to

Salko Mehmedovic - This paper was about how the Whig Party raised and fell. This paper also includes the rise of the Republican Party. - My theory is that the Whigs dissolved, because they didn’t want to focus on the issue of slavery. The Whigs were eventually taken over by the Republican Party, because the Republicans supported this issue of slavery. - Whigs - Didn’t have origins in the United States. They were created in England whom they represented the landowners and financial interests. -

The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War is written by Thomas J. DiLorenzo. He is the professor of economics at Loyola University Maryland and a member of the senior faculty of the Mises Institute. He has received the George F. Koether Free Market Writing Award and his works have been published in the Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. He has written another book titled Hamilton 's Curse: How Jefferson’s Archenemy Betrayed the American Revolution —