X-File

making digital copies. While many consumers are turning to free file sharing in downloading online

Illegally downloading music from the Internet is a significant moral dilemma because while no physical harm is being done to anyone, the artists who create the songs are not being compensated for their work. Pirating music can constitute as stealing because the music that is being illegally downloaded is not being paid for. While pirating raises a moral concern, many people still download music illegally every day without justifying their actions. In this paper, I will attempt to use act utilitarianism

1. Compared with illegal, free platforms, what are the advantages that prompt Internet users to subscribe to Spotify? - Internet users will be able to obtain quality music with Spotify. They also decrease their risks of getting into legal issues and possibility exposing their computer to any viruses. 2. What are Spotify’s advantages over other legal music streaming services? - Spotify advantages over other legal music streaming services include free subscriptions, easy to use, able to use on multiple

three boys, Shawn Fanning, John Fanning, and Sean Fanning, worked hard on their project, they could’ve never imagined that their invention, a peer to peer music file sharing service called, Napster, would effectively revolutionize the way an entire generation created, delivered, and received its entertainment. Since then, the internet, file sharing, and the music industry has changed drastically. Since Napster’s invention in 1999 we’ve had millions of different similar services come about such as iTunes

your assets (even non-exempt assets). Your plan will pay your creditors, fully or partially, over a period of three to five years, interest free! Some of the other benefits of filing a Chapter 13 bankruptcy include: • Automatic stay. As soon as you file your petition for bankruptcy, all collection activity against you is stopped by the automatic stay. This includes foreclosures, repossessions

P2P file-sharing: downloading illegal content such as movie, music, and etc. No matter how one rationalize their own actions, anyone could agree that stealing is consider wrong. Furthermore, our society have become habituated to P2P file sharing and the idea of distributing and downloading free content for themselves. What would Kant think about P2P file-sharers? In Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, I believe that Kant would disapprove of P2P file sharing. If P2P file-sharing became

CABANA BAY BEACH RESORT: MISSING GUEST PROPERTY 121117-306?? On Monday, December 11, 2017 at approximately 3:00 PM Security Supervisor Carolyn Nolin was contacted (via email) by former guest Paulena Wermuth in reference to missing guest property. Wermuth stated she checked into Cabana Bay Beach Resort on December 9, 2017 to room 6730. Wermuth stated on December 10, 2017 she and her husband checked out of room 6730. Wermuth stated she left a gift bag containing a bottle of wine and a card with $100

Napster is known for peer-to-peer file sharing with the public. Napster is a company where people can upload music for free. You can upload large about of files easily. They are violating the copyright law. They were making copies of the music industry and individual had access to it with no cost. Neither the copyright owner nor the artist gave them the rights to distribute their music without a profit. Napster did commit a violation in this case and any other company that did or will function

In 2018 a mother of a 12-year-old girl in New York settled a lawsuit of $2000 because she was illegally sharing copyrighted music files according to www.pediatrics.about.com. Why would someone want to do that? As the person, you’re taking the money of someone else’s hard work. The artist that wrote the song took a lot of time and effort to make it. There are thousands of music artist and stealing their money is not fair for all they do. To stop this from occurring there must be harsher penalties

infringement cases that later defined the legality of file sharing. It was a class action lawsuit that include over fifteen major record labels including Universal Studios, Warner Bros, and Sony Entertainment. The official case though is called A&M Records vs Napster. A&M Records sued Napster claiming they were infringing on their plaintiff's intellectual property. Napster was a peer to peer file sharing service. It was mostly used to share mp3 music files in mass volumes. This was right at the start of