A new screening test for thyroid cancer was administered to 1,000 adult volunteers at a large medical center complex in Europe. The results showed that 152 out of 160 diagnosed cases of thyroid cancer were correctly identified by the screening test. Also, of the 840 individuals without thyroid cancer, the screening test correctly identified 714. Base on this information, calculate the test's: 1. Sensitivity 2. Specificity 3. Positive Predictive Value 4. Negative Predictive Value 5. Accuracy 6. Prevalence rate

A new screening test for thyroid cancer was administered to 1,000 adult volunteers at a large medical center complex in Europe. The results showed that 152 out of 160 diagnosed cases of thyroid cancer were correctly identified by the screening test. Also, of the 840 individuals without thyroid cancer, the screening test correctly identified 714. Base on this information, calculate the test's: 1. Sensitivity 2. Specificity 3. Positive Predictive Value 4. Negative Predictive Value 5. Accuracy 6. Prevalence rate

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018

18th Edition

ISBN:9780079039897

Author:Carter

Publisher:Carter

Chapter10: Statistics

Section10.5: Comparing Sets Of Data

Problem 14PPS

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Your screening facility can process 1,000 people per week. Assume you are attempting the early detection of a disease with a prevalence of 2%, and your test has a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 90%. A- How many of the people screened in a week will test positive? B- Of those screened, in how many will the results be truly positive? C- of those screened, in how many will the results be truly negative? D- what is the positive predictive value of the screening test? E- what is the negative predictive value of the screening test? F- what would happen to the negative predictive value of the screening test if the prevalence was 5%?
In elderly Americans, a new blood test is being developed to diagnose a particular disease. Suppose the sensitivity of this test is 80% and specificity is 70%. If it is known that 25% of them have the particular disease, then calculate the negative predictive value.
A nutrition store in the mall is selling “Memory Booster,” which is a concoction of herbs and minerals that is intended to improve memory performance, but there is no good reason to think it couldn't possibly do the opposite. To test the effectiveness of the herbal mix, a researcher obtains a sample of 8 participants and asks each person to take the suggested dosage each day for 4 weeks. At the end of the 4-week period, each individual takes a standardized memory test. In the general population, the standardized test is known to have a mean of μ = 7. The scores for the 8 participants are 12, 11, 13, 15, 8, 11, 13, 15 (Set the significance level a = .05)
A new drug for pain relief is being tested within a given palliative care population. The new drug is being compared to an already approved pain relief drug that is commonly used in providing palliative care to patients who experience chronic severe pain. Assume the patients are asked to rate the pain on a scale from 1 to 10, and the data presented below was obtained from a small study designed to compare the effectiveness of the two drugs. Set up and interpret the results of a Mann-Whitney U test with an alpha of .05. Pain Rating as Reported by Patients Old Drug 1 2 2 4 6 New Drug 1 2 2 3 7 Old Drug New Drug Total Sample (Ordered Smallest to Largest) Ranks Old Drug New Drug Old Drug New Drug 1 1 1 1 1.5 1.5 2 2 2 2 4.5 4.5 2 2 2 2 4.5 4.5 4 3 3 7 6 7 4 8 6…
A new drug for pain relief is being tested within a given palliative care population. The new drug is being compared to an already approved pain relief drug that is commonly used in providing palliative care to patients who experience chronic severe pain. Assume the patients are asked to rate the pain on a scale from 1 to 10, and the data presented below was obtained from a small study designed to compare the effectiveness of the two drugs. Set up and interpret the results of a Mann-Whitney U test with an alpha of .05. Pain Rating as Reported by Patients Old Drug 1 3 3 4 6 New Drug 1 2 3 3 7
A new drug for pain relief is being tested within a given palliative care population. The new drug is being compared to an already approved pain relief drug that is commonly used in providing palliative care to patients who experience chronic severe pain. Assume the patients are asked to rate the pain on a scale from 1 to 10, and the data presented below was obtained from a small study designed to compare the effectiveness of the two drugs. Set up and interpret the results of a Mann-Whitney U test with an alpha of .05. Pain Rating as Reported by PatientsOld Drug 1 2 2 4 6 New Drug 1 2 2 3 7Old Drug New Drug Total Sample(Ordered Smallest to Largest) RanksOld Drug New Drug Old Drug New DrugR1= R2= A) We reject H0 in favor of H1, which states the two populations are not equal at the alpha equals .05 level because the calculated U value of 12.5 is greater than the critical U value of 2.B) We reject H0 in favor of H1, which states the two populations are not equal at the alpha equals .05…
A new drug for pain relief is being tested within a given palliative care population. The new drug is being compared to an already approved pain relief drug that is commonly used in providing palliative care to patients who experience chronic severe pain. Assume the patients are asked to rate the pain on a scale from 1 to 10, and the data presented below was obtained from a small study designed to compare the effectiveness of the two drugs. Set up and interpret the results of a Mann-Whitney U test with an alpha of .05. Pain Rating as Reported by Patients Old Drug 1 3 3 4 6 New Drug 1 2 3 3 7 Old Drug New Drug Total Sample (Ordered Smallest to Largest) Ranks Old Drug New Drug Old Drug New Drug…
A new drug for pain relief is being tested within a given palliative care population. The new drug is being compared to an already approved pain relief drug that is commonly used in providing palliative care to patients who experience chronic severe pain. Assume the patients are asked to rate the pain on a scale from 1 to 10, and the data presented below was obtained from a small study designed to compare the effectiveness of the two drugs. Set up and interpret the results of a Mann-Whitney U test with an alpha of .05. Pain Rating as Reported by Patients Old Drug 1 3 3 4 6 New Drug 1 2 3 3 7 Old Drug New Drug Total Sample (Ordered Smallest to Largest) Ranks Old Drug New Drug Old Drug New Drug…