Assume no Washington income tax, and Washington has a $4M grant to spend. Zoe Wu tells the mayor that a means-tested program would allow the poor to get more money. She suggests that benefits should be redunced by $10 for each $100 in workers’ pre-tax income.   Suppose the guarantee rate is G. How much benefit would each group get at their original income (working 40 weeks) in terms of G?   2 2. With the $4M grant, how large can G be? How much benefit does each group get? What is the maximum income in the phase-out region?

Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student Edition
1st Edition
ISBN:9780078747663
Author:McGraw-Hill
Publisher:McGraw-Hill
Chapter16: Government Spends, Collects, And Owes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 20AA
icon
Related questions
Question

Question 1

 

  Assume no Washington income tax, and Washington has a $4M grant to spend. Zoe Wu tells the mayor that a means-tested program would allow the poor to get more money. She suggests that benefits should be redunced by $10 for each $100 in workers’ pre-tax income.

 

  1. Suppose the guarantee rate is G. How much benefit would each group get at their original income (working 40 weeks) in terms of G?

 

2 2. With the $4M grant, how large can G be? How much benefit does each group get? What is the maximum income in the phase-out region?

 

  1. Draw the benefit schedule with labels.

 

  1. Suppose the government could identify workers’ type and sent them money equal to your answer in part (b), regardless of their labor supply choice.

 

(a) What is the percentage change in workers’ wealth, the dollar value of their time plus unearned income?

 

(b) How many weeks per year would each type work using the elasticity of η = −0.1? Compare your answer to 4(d). Explain why they are similar or different.

 

  1. C) estimate the additional effect of benefit phase-out (the tax) for those who recieve benefits using the elasticity of ε u = 0.3. What is the total number of weeks worked by each type?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Question 2

 

  1. Give an assessment of the Wu and Tang plans. Compare the plans’ effectiveness in combatting poverty?

 

Assess the degree to which ignoring incentives would generate a budget shortfall under each plan. Explain to Mayor Rita, Zoe, and Andrew the pros and cons of each.   

Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Federal Budget
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student Edition
Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student Edition
Economics
ISBN:
9780078747663
Author:
McGraw-Hill
Publisher:
Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou…
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506725
Author:
James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa…
Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506756
Author:
James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa…
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506893
Author:
James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305971493
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou…
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou…
Economics
ISBN:
9781285165875
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning