Consider the following 2 period model, defining outcomes for people who choose to go or not go to school. Call the periods P1 (school or work) and P2 (work) - If they attend school, earn no income in P1, and earn WH in P2. - If they do NOT attend school, earn income WL in both periods. - At first, there are no costs to schooling, no intrinsic benefits, and people do not discount future earnings.

Principles of Economics 2e
2nd Edition
ISBN:9781947172364
Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Chapter2: Choice In A World Of Scarcity
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 7SCQ: Would a research study on the effects of soft drink consumption on childrens cognitive development...
icon
Related questions
Question

4.

 

QUESTION 9
Consider the following 2 period model, defining outcomes for people who choose to go or not go to school. Call the periods P1 (school or work) and P2 (work)
- If they attend school, earn no income in P1, and earn WH in P2.
- If they do NOT attend school, earn income WL in both periods.
- At first, there are no costs to schooling, no intrinsic benefits, and people do not discount future earnings.
Suppose WH < WL, will the individual choose school? ves
If WH = 10 and WL = 7, will they choose school or not? not
Keep WH = 10 and WL = 7 and add an intrinsic value (1) of education to the model. If I = 6, will they choose school or not?
Now let WH and WL be unknown parameters again, and suppose that there are direct costs C, intrinsic value of schooling I, and individuals discount their future
earnings at a rate of D such that 0 <D<1.
What is the individual's total net income over both periods if they choose not to go to school in terms of the parameters WL and B?
What is the individual's total net income over both periods if they choose to go to school in terms of the relevant parameters?
Transcribed Image Text:QUESTION 9 Consider the following 2 period model, defining outcomes for people who choose to go or not go to school. Call the periods P1 (school or work) and P2 (work) - If they attend school, earn no income in P1, and earn WH in P2. - If they do NOT attend school, earn income WL in both periods. - At first, there are no costs to schooling, no intrinsic benefits, and people do not discount future earnings. Suppose WH < WL, will the individual choose school? ves If WH = 10 and WL = 7, will they choose school or not? not Keep WH = 10 and WL = 7 and add an intrinsic value (1) of education to the model. If I = 6, will they choose school or not? Now let WH and WL be unknown parameters again, and suppose that there are direct costs C, intrinsic value of schooling I, and individuals discount their future earnings at a rate of D such that 0 <D<1. What is the individual's total net income over both periods if they choose not to go to school in terms of the parameters WL and B? What is the individual's total net income over both periods if they choose to go to school in terms of the relevant parameters?
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Depreciation
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics 2e
Principles of Economics 2e
Economics
ISBN:
9781947172364
Author:
Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:
OpenStax