For this problem, we will explore the issue of truthfulness in the Stable Matching Problem and specifically in the Gale-Shapley algorithm. The basic question is: Can a man or a woman end up better off by lying about his or her preferences? More concretely, we suppose each participant has a true preference order. Now consider a woman w. Suppose w prefers man m to m, but both m and m are low on her list of preferences. Can it be the case that by switching the order of m and m on her list of preferences (i.e., by falsely claiming that she prefers m to m) and running the algorithm with this false preference list, w will end up with a man m that she truly prefers to both m and m? (We can ask the same question for men, but will focus on the case of women for purposes of this question.) Resolve this question by doing one of the following two things: (a) Give a proof that, for any set of preference lists, switching the order of a pair on the list cannot improve a woman’s partner in the GaleShapley algorithm; or (b) Give an example of a set of preference lists for which there is a switch that would improve the partner of a woman who switched preferences.

Operations Research : Applications and Algorithms
4th Edition
ISBN:9780534380588
Author:Wayne L. Winston
Publisher:Wayne L. Winston
Chapter14: Game Theory
Section14.3: Linear Programming And Zero-sum Games
Problem 9P
icon
Related questions
Question

For this problem, we will explore the issue of truthfulness in the Stable
Matching Problem and specifically in the Gale-Shapley algorithm. The
basic question is: Can a man or a woman end up better off by lying about
his or her preferences? More concretely, we suppose each participant has
a true preference order. Now consider a woman w. Suppose w prefers man
m to m, but both m and m are low on her list of preferences. Can it be the
case that by switching the order of m and m on her list of preferences (i.e.,
by falsely claiming that she prefers m to m) and running the algorithm
with this false preference list, w will end up with a man m that she truly
prefers to both m and m? (We can ask the same question for men, but
will focus on the case of women for purposes of this question.)
Resolve this question by doing one of the following two things:

(a) Give a proof that, for any set of preference lists, switching the
order of a pair on the list cannot improve a woman’s partner in the GaleShapley algorithm; or

(b) Give an example of a set of preference lists for which there is
a switch that would improve the partner of a woman who switched
preferences.

Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Temporal Difference Learning
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, computer-science and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Operations Research : Applications and Algorithms
Operations Research : Applications and Algorithms
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780534380588
Author:
Wayne L. Winston
Publisher:
Brooks Cole