Kimball, a partner in a one-office firm, inherits 15 shares of Spotless Housekeeping Services stock. The stock has a market value of $25 per share; there is a ready market for them; and there are 300,000 shares outstanding. Spotless is an audit client of the firm, and Kimball does no work or consulting for Spotless engagements. Which of the following is CORRECT regarding Kimball receiving this stock and maintaining the firm's independence with Spotless? As long as Kimball does not work on the engagements for Spotless, nothing need be done. If he works on the engagements for Spotless, then the shares must be promptly sold to preserve the firm's independence. Since the shares are worth only $375 and they were inherited, nothing need be done. If Kimball transfers the shares to a blind trust where he is the beneficiary, independence with Spotless will not be impaired. The shares must be sold within 30 daur

Kimball, a partner in a one-office firm, inherits 15 shares of Spotless Housekeeping Services stock. The stock has a market value of $25 per share; there is a ready market for them; and there are 300,000 shares outstanding. Spotless is an audit client of the firm, and Kimball does no work or consulting for Spotless engagements. Which of the following is CORRECT regarding Kimball receiving this stock and maintaining the firm's independence with Spotless? As long as Kimball does not work on the engagements for Spotless, nothing need be done. If he works on the engagements for Spotless, then the shares must be promptly sold to preserve the firm's independence. Since the shares are worth only $375 and they were inherited, nothing need be done. If Kimball transfers the shares to a blind trust where he is the beneficiary, independence with Spotless will not be impaired. The shares must be sold within 30 daur

Individual Income Taxes

43rd Edition

ISBN:9780357109731

Author:Hoffman

Publisher:Hoffman

Chapter19: Deferred Compensation

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 24CE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

CPA Kara Rambo is the auditor of Ajax Corporation. Her audit independence will not be considered impaired if shea. Owns $1,000 worth of Ajax stock. b. Has a husband who owns $1,000 worth of Ajax stock. c. Has a sister who is the financial vice president of Ajax. d. Owns $1,000 worth of the stock of Pericles Corporation, which is controlled by Ajax as a result of Ajax’s ownership of 40 percent of Pericles’ stock, and Pericles contributes 3 percent of its total assets and income in Ajax’s financial statements.
James Wane was offered to audit BMX Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2020. He had served as a Non-executive director of BMX Ltd until 30 June 2017 and his spouse currently owns 10,000 of the 100,000 outstanding shares of BMX. James Must: Select one:a. Discuss with the spouse about this offer. b. Accept the engagement and get the support of his spouse whenever necessary. c. Accept the engagement and remain silent. d. None of the given answers is correct.
In the following case, identify all the violations of the rules of conduct of the Code of Professional Ethics, indicate the rule and explain why it was violated. Carmen and Carlos formed a corporation called CPA al servicio. 50% of all issued shares are divided between the two owner shareholders. Carmen in CPA and member of the AICPA Carlos is an appraiser. They announce themselves as members of the AICPA. They were hired to do an audit, the payment of which will be based on the findings of the CPA. Carmen commented with another CPA colleague on important aspects of the case to be audited. During the audit Carmen found deviations from the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Carmen gave an opinion in the report of her "unqualified without qualification."102 Integrity and objectivity } 201 General standards } 202 Compliance with standards } 203 Accounting Principles } 301 Confidential customer information } 302 Contingency expenses } 501 Acts of discredit } 502 Promotion or…
Scott requested Jenny to work with the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) in further reducing the tax liability of the company believing her to be an accountant. Meanwhile, Jenny took advantage of Scott’s mistaken belief and trust and convinced him that he would reduce the company’s tax liability by 50% in exchange for a substantive number of shares in the company. Is Scott’s donation of a substantive number of the company’s shares to Jenny valid? Why or why not?
Scott requested Jenny to work with the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) in further reducing the tax liability of thecompany believing her to be an accountant. Meanwhile, Jennytook advantage of Scott’s mistaken belief and trust and convinced him that he would reduce the company’s tax liability by 50% in exchange for a substantive number of shares in the company. Is Scott’s donation of a substantive number of the company’s shares to Jenny valid? Why or whynot?
A bylaw of Betma Corporation provides that no share- holder can sell his shares unless he first offers them for sale to the corporation or its directors. The bylaw also states that this restriction shall be printed or stamped upon each stock certificate and shall bind all present or future owners or holders. Betma Corporation did not comply with this latter provision. Shaw, having knowledge of the bylaw restriction, nevertheless purchased twenty shares of the corporation’s stock from Rice, without having Rice first offer them for sale to the corporation or its directors. When Betma Corporation refused to effectuate a transfer of the shares to her, Shaw sued to compel a transfer and the issuance of a new certificate to her. What result?
Thomas Gilbert and Susan Bradley formed a professional corporation called “Financial Services Inc.—A Professional Corporation,” each taking 50 percent of the authorized common stock. Gilbert is a CPA and a member of the AICPA. Bradley is a CPCU (Chartered Property Casualty Underwriter). The corporation performs auditing and tax services under Gilbert’s direction and insurance services under Bradley’s supervision. One of the corporation’s first audit clients was Grandtime Company. Grandtime had total assets of $600,000 and total liabilities of $270,000. In the course of his examination, Gilbert found that Grandtime’s building, with a carrying value of $240,000, was pledged as collateral for a 10-year term note in the amount of $200,000. The client’s financial statements did not mention that the building was pledged as collateral for the 10-year term note. However, as the failure to disclose the lien did not affect either the value of the assets or the amount of the liabilities, and his…
A, an individual, is an architect and general contractor. B is a wealthy individual. Newco's Certificate of Incorporation states that it is authorized to issue 200 shares, no par value of common stock. B transfers S500,000 of cash to Newco in exchange for 50 shares of Newco's stock. A signs a contract with Newco in which A will perform services designing a housing project and then acting as general contractor on the construction of that housing project. In exchange, A will receive 50 shares of Newco's stock. 1b) Suppose instead that A and Newco do not enter into a written contract. A transfers $500 in cash for 50 shares of Newco's stock while B transfers $500,000 for 50 shares of Newco's stock. A then performs the architectural and contracting services for no further charge. Would this change your answer?
Joe wants to sell stock to his brother Michael. The fair market value of the stock is $10,000 and as this stock is traded on a national exchange it is very easy to demonstrate that this price is a fair price. Joe's basis in the stock is $30,000. Will the Related party disallowance rules from section 267 still apply? What abuse are the IRS trying to prevent with the 267 rules? b) Joe sells the stock two months after the distribution for $47,000. The alternative valuation date was elected. What does Joe recognize on his tax return with respect to this transaction? Dan wishes to determine if Thomas meets the requirements of a dependent on his 2021 federal income tax return. What 6 tests must be satisfied in order for Dan to treat Thomas as a dependent under the qualifying child test? Sara is the sole shareholder of Lee Corporation. During 2021, Lee Corporation distributes $300,000 in cash to Sara. Lee Corporation's E&P was $120,000 prior to this distribution. Sara's basis in…
George, an individual, is an architect and general contractor. Gracie is a wealthy individual. Newco’s Certificate of Incorporation states that it is authorized to issue 200 shares, no par value of common stock. Gracie transfers $500,000 of cash to Newco in exchange for 50 shares of Newco's stock. George signs a contract with Newco in which George will perform services designing a housing project and then acting as general contractor on the construction of that housing project. In exchange, George will receive 50 shares of Newco's stock. a. How will A be treated in this transaction? b. Suppose instead that George and Newco do not enter into a written contract. George transfers $500 in cash for 50 shares of Newco's stock while Gracie transfers $500,000 for 50 shares of Newco's stock. George then performs the architectural and contracting services for no further charge. Would this change your answer
On February 2, Phillips induced Miller to purchase from her fifty shares of stock in the XYZ Corporation for $10,000, representing that the actual book value of each share was $200. A certificate for fifty shares was delivered to Miller. On February 16, Miller discovered that the book value on February 2 was only $50 per share. Will Miller be successful in a lawsuit against Phillips? Why or why not?
Katy Kirkland, a former employee of the Sand Dune Resorts, Inc., owned 500 shares of stock (10%) in the company. Kirkland was terminated after five years of employment at Sand Dunes; however, she became part owner of Holiday Isles, Inc., a competitor of Sand Dunes. When Sand Dunes made Kirkland an offer to purchase her stocks, she requested access to Sand Dunes' corporate books to determine the value of her 500 shares of stock. Sand Dunes refused on the basis that Kirkland was a competitor. Does Kirkland have a right to view the books? Why or why not? Propose a solution to the situation.