Option 1. Dr. Brown lists many examples of "the paradoxes that elicit vulnerability in leaders" in the Curiosity and Grounded Confidence chapter of Dare to Lead. (In my copy, this is on page 169.) Choose one paradox and write a case study that describes a scenario in which a leader is prompted to examine an issue from both sides of the paradox. Describe the issue from both sides of the paradox and make a recommendation for action that addresses both, if possible. The organization can be real or fictional-but-realistic. Be sure to describe the industry, the size and purpose of the organization, and a bit about the existing culture. What information would be most valuable for the leader to gather as they confront the issue? Support your ideas with scholarly article(s)/resource(s) as appropriate. Reference Dare to Lead Reading Assignment – Part Three: Braving Trust + Part Four: Learning to Rise Creative Mentorship and Career-Building Strategies - Read Chapters 9 + Conclusion Dare to Lead - List of Values - Click here for a pdf of this list (opens in a new window) Dare to Lead - The Engaged Feedback Checklist - Click here for a pdf of this list (opens in a new window) Engelbrecht, A. S., Heine, G. & Mahembe, B. (2017). Integrity, ethical leadership, trust and work engagement. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(3), p. 368 - 379. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-11-2015-0237 Click here for a pdf of this article (opens in a new window) Thomassen, O. J., Strand, R. & Heggen, K. (2017). Exploring the concept of integrity - toward a craftinspired interpretation. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 7(S2), p. 39 - 50. Click here for a pdf of this article (opens in a new window) Ikavalko, H., Hokka, P., Paloniemi, S. & Vahasantanen, K. (2020). Emotional competence at work. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(7), p. 1485 - 1498. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-01-2020-0024 Click here for a pdf of this article (opens in a new window)
Option 1. Dr. Brown lists many examples of "the paradoxes that elicit vulnerability in leaders" in the Curiosity and Grounded Confidence chapter of Dare to Lead. (In my copy, this is on page 169.) Choose one paradox and write a case study that describes a scenario in which a leader is prompted to examine an issue from both sides of the paradox. Describe the issue from both sides of the paradox and make a recommendation for action that addresses both, if possible. The organization can be real or fictional-but-realistic. Be sure to describe the industry, the size and purpose of the organization, and a bit about the existing culture. What information would be most valuable for the leader to gather as they confront the issue? Support your ideas with scholarly article(s)/resource(s) as appropriate.
Reference
Dare to Lead Reading Assignment – Part Three: Braving Trust + Part Four: Learning to Rise
Creative Mentorship and Career-Building Strategies - Read Chapters 9 + Conclusion
Dare to Lead - List of Values - Click here for a pdf of this list (opens in a new window)
Dare to Lead - The Engaged Feedback Checklist - Click here for a pdf of this list (opens in a new window)
Engelbrecht, A. S., Heine, G. & Mahembe, B. (2017). Integrity, ethical leadership, trust and work engagement. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(3), p. 368 - 379. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-11-2015-0237 Click here for a pdf of this article (opens in a new window)
Thomassen, O. J., Strand, R. & Heggen, K. (2017). Exploring the concept of integrity - toward a craftinspired interpretation. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 7(S2), p. 39 - 50. Click here for a pdf of this article (opens in a new window)
Ikavalko, H., Hokka, P., Paloniemi, S. & Vahasantanen, K. (2020). Emotional competence at work. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(7), p. 1485 - 1498. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-01-2020-0024 Click here for a pdf of this article (opens in a new window)
Unlock instant AI solutions
Tap the button
to generate a solution