Please explain correctly. Economics According to the 2016 Human Development Report (see pp. 198-201), Pakistan fares more poorly in the HDI ranking (148) than in the GNI per capita (PPP US$) ranking (138). Argentina fares better in the HDI ranking (45) than GDP per capita (57). Are these results surprising? How would you explain the discrepancy in the rankings?

Please explain correctly. Economics According to the 2016 Human Development Report (see pp. 198-201), Pakistan fares more poorly in the HDI ranking (148) than in the GNI per capita (PPP US$) ranking (138). Argentina fares better in the HDI ranking (45) than GDP per capita (57). Are these results surprising? How would you explain the discrepancy in the rankings?

Principles of Economics 2e

2nd Edition

ISBN:9781947172364

Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Chapter32: Macroeconomic Policy Around The World

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 30P: Retrieve the following data from The World Bank database (http //databank.worldbank. org/data/...

See similar textbooks

Economics

According to the 2016 Human Development Report (see pp. 198-201), Pakistan fares more poorly in the HDI ranking (148) than in the GNI per capita (PPP US$) ranking (138). Argentina fares better in the HDI ranking (45) than GDP per capita (57). Are these results surprising? How would you explain the discrepancy in the rankings?

Definition Video Definition Overall monetary value of all the complete or final services and goods that a country can produce within its domestic boundaries in a specific period. Video

Expert Solution

This question has been solved!

Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Step 1 Introduction

VIEW

Step 2 Explanation

VIEW

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

Similar questions

Retrieve the following data from The World Bank database (http //databank.worldbank. org/data/ home.aspx) for India, Spain, and South Africa for the most recent year available: â€¢ GDP in constant international dollars or PPP â€¢ Population â€¢ GOP per person in constant international dollars â€¢ Mortality rate, infant (per 1,000 live births) â€¢ Health expenditure per capita (current U.S. dollars) â€¢ Life expectancy at birth, total (years)
In 1980, Denmark had a GDP of $70 billion (measured in U.S. dollars) and a population of 5.1 million. In 2000, Denmark had a GDP of $160 billion (measured in U.S. dollars) and a population of 5.3 million. By what percentage did Denmark’s GDP per capita rise between 1980 and 2000?
Explain why GDP per capita comparison among nations are not a perfect measure of differences in economic well-being. (Hint: there are four problems with using GDP per capita to compare rich versus poor countries)
Which GDP result (current or constant) is more appropriate for comparative purpose with other countries?
In 1989, America's GDP per capita was approximately 30,000 (measured in today's dollars). How much higher in percentage terms was America's GDP per capita in 2015?
In 1980, Denmark had a GDP of $90 billion (measured in US dollars) and a population of 6.1 million. In 2000, Denmark had a GDP of $150 billion (measured in US dollars) and a population of 6.2 million. By what percentage did Denmark's GDP per capita rise between 1980 and 2000? Question 23 options: 205% 144% 64% 120%
should the GDP per capita in the united states be higher than Canada's
The following table lists 2012 GDP per capita for four countries. The data are given in the national currencies of the countries. It also lists the price of a Big Mac in local currency in each country in 2012. The price of a Big Mac in the United States in 2012 was $4.10. Using the Big Mac as a representative commodity common to the countries, calculate the purchasing power parity (PPP)-adjustment factor for each country, and then the PPP level of GDP per capita in each country. (Round your responses for the PPP-adjustment factor to three decimal places and round PPP GDP per capita to the nearest integer.) 2012 GDP per Capita 2012 Big Mac Price Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)- Adjustment Factor PPP Level of GDP per Capita Norway (krone) Poland (zloty) 579,162 41 krone 41,398 9.1 zloty Turkey (Turkish lira) 19,580 6.6 Turkish lira United Kingdom (British pound) 24,740 2.49 pounds AFARI
Explain three (30 comparative differences between real GDP and real GDP per capita.
South Africa has a GDP of $10 billion (measured in U.S. dollars) and a population of 45 million. Ecuador has a GDP of $12 billion (measured in U.S. dollars) and a population of 4.5 million. Calculate per capita GDP for each country. Question 24 options: South Africa = $222.22; Ecuador = $2,666.67 South Africa = $22.22; Ecuador = $266.67 South Africa = $2222.22; Ecuador = $26,666.67 South Africa = $22.22; Ecuador = $2,666.67
Discuss the relationship of the developed countries (usually referred as the core) and the developing countries (the periphery) in terms of production and consumption.
Per capita GDP and average annual incomes are much higher in Alberta than New Brunswick. New Brunswick's economy has not grown in over a decade (at least not very much) while Alberta's GDP has grown a lot. At the same time, self reported life satisfaction is higher in New Brunswick than in Alberta. Does this show that GDP growth and higher income are not contributing to happiness? Should New Brunswick stop worrying about trying to grow it's GDP?