Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Business
Economics
Question 4 John and Sotiris live on trees in two different forests. They each have eight hours to work in a day. John can grow a Yam in 1 hour or raise a Zebra in 2 hours. Sotiris can grow a Yam in 2 hours or raise a Zebra in 4 hours. Both John and Sotiris consume equal numbers of Yams and Zebras. (a) Clearly draw and label PPFS for John and Sotiris and their consumption bundle in autarky, with Zebras on the vertical axis, showing how you calculated this. Define and find the opportunity cost of a yam on each island and discuss how it can be represented on each PPF. Does John or Sotiris have an absolute or comparative advantage in producing either Yams or Zebras? (b) Now suppose John and Sotiris can freely trade at a price of one Yam per Zebra. How much of each good will John and Sotiris produce and consume? How much better or worse off in percentage terms are John and Sotiris? How is this possible? (c) In class, we have seen that free exchange under perfect competition can mutually benefit both consumers and producers. In words, briefly explain how this is possible. Then clearly list five situations that free exchange can hurt consumers or producers and an assumption about perfect competition that situation violates. (d) When calculating the welfare benefits of markets, the standard analysis only includes the parties involved in exchange. Using the American Opioid Crisis as an example, explain how poorly regulated markets can cause harm to third parties not involved in exchange

Question 4 John and Sotiris live on trees in two different forests. They each have eight hours to work in a day. John can grow a Yam in 1 hour or raise a Zebra in 2 hours. Sotiris can grow a Yam in 2 hours or raise a Zebra in 4 hours. Both John and Sotiris consume equal numbers of Yams and Zebras. (a) Clearly draw and label PPFS for John and Sotiris and their consumption bundle in autarky, with Zebras on the vertical axis, showing how you calculated this. Define and find the opportunity cost of a yam on each island and discuss how it can be represented on each PPF. Does John or Sotiris have an absolute or comparative advantage in producing either Yams or Zebras? (b) Now suppose John and Sotiris can freely trade at a price of one Yam per Zebra. How much of each good will John and Sotiris produce and consume? How much better or worse off in percentage terms are John and Sotiris? How is this possible? (c) In class, we have seen that free exchange under perfect competition can mutually benefit both consumers and producers. In words, briefly explain how this is possible. Then clearly list five situations that free exchange can hurt consumers or producers and an assumption about perfect competition that situation violates. (d) When calculating the welfare benefits of markets, the standard analysis only includes the parties involved in exchange. Using the American Opioid Crisis as an example, explain how poorly regulated markets can cause harm to third parties not involved in exchange

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
Practice Pack

Solve the Given question from economics question  attached below?

Question 4 John and Sotiris live on trees in two different forests. They each have eight hours to work in a day. John can grow a Yam in 1 hour or raise a Zebra in 2 hours. Sotiris can grow a Yam in 2 hours or raise a Zebra in 4 hours. Both John and Sotiris consume equal numbers of Yams and Zebras. (a) Clearly draw and label PPFS for John and Sotiris and their consumption bundle in autarky, with Zebras on the vertical axis, showing how you calculated this. Define and find the opportunity cost of a yam on each island and discuss how it can be represented on each PPF. Does John or Sotiris have an absolute or comparative advantage in producing either Yams or Zebras? (b) Now suppose John and Sotiris can freely trade at a price of one Yam per Zebra. How much of each good will John and Sotiris produce and consume? How much better or worse off in percentage terms are John and Sotiris? How is this possible? (c) In class, we have seen that free exchange under perfect competition can mutually benefit both consumers and producers. In words, briefly explain how this is possible. Then clearly list five situations that free exchange can hurt consumers or producers and an assumption about perfect competition that situation violates. (d) When calculating the welfare benefits of markets, the standard analysis only includes the parties involved in exchange. Using the American Opioid Crisis as an example, explain how poorly regulated markets can cause harm to third parties not involved in exchange
Transcribed Image Text:Question 4 John and Sotiris live on trees in two different forests. They each have eight hours to work in a day. John can grow a Yam in 1 hour or raise a Zebra in 2 hours. Sotiris can grow a Yam in 2 hours or raise a Zebra in 4 hours. Both John and Sotiris consume equal numbers of Yams and Zebras. (a) Clearly draw and label PPFS for John and Sotiris and their consumption bundle in autarky, with Zebras on the vertical axis, showing how you calculated this. Define and find the opportunity cost of a yam on each island and discuss how it can be represented on each PPF. Does John or Sotiris have an absolute or comparative advantage in producing either Yams or Zebras? (b) Now suppose John and Sotiris can freely trade at a price of one Yam per Zebra. How much of each good will John and Sotiris produce and consume? How much better or worse off in percentage terms are John and Sotiris? How is this possible? (c) In class, we have seen that free exchange under perfect competition can mutually benefit both consumers and producers. In words, briefly explain how this is possible. Then clearly list five situations that free exchange can hurt consumers or producers and an assumption about perfect competition that situation violates. (d) When calculating the welfare benefits of markets, the standard analysis only includes the parties involved in exchange. Using the American Opioid Crisis as an example, explain how poorly regulated markets can cause harm to third parties not involved in exchange
Expert Solution
video

Learn your way

Includes step-by-step video

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 1 images

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Risk
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS