Question
- The Endangered Species Act (ESA) charges the National Marine Fisheries Service (a federal agency) with the duty to “ensure” that any proposed action by the council does not “jeopardize” any threatened or endangered species. The Steller sea lion is on the list of endangered species. The agency developed a North Pacific marine fishery plan that permitted a significant harvest of fish by commercial fisheries in the area. Greenpeace, an environmental group, challenged the agency on the grounds that the plan was not based on a sufficient number of biological studies on the impact of the allowed fishing on the Steller sea lion. Greenpeace’s biologic opinion concluded that the fishery plan would reduce the level of food for the sea lions by about 40% to 60% if the juvenile fish were not counted in that figure. Greenpeace’s expert maintained that counting juvenile fish was misleading because they were not capable of reproducing and the government agency’s figure was, as a result, much lower at 22% [Greenpeace, American Oceans Campaign v. National Marine Fisheries Service, 237 F. Supp. 2d 1181 (W.D. Wash.)]. What would Greenpeace need to show to be successful in challenging the agency’s fishery plan? What would be their next step(s)? Provide a rationale or explain how you came to this determination.
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 3 steps

Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- the tragedy of commons, in Hardin's sense, often plays itself out in environmental ways, from generic human self-interest to overuse of finite resources and environmental degradation. How might the tragedy of the commons, as enacted through commercial enterprise, play out with respect to society? Isolate some examples of the tragedy of the commons, and discuss whether a resolution to this problem is possible, and if so, how it might come about.arrow_forwardA manager from a developing country is in charge of a multinational's operations in a country plagued by drug trafficking and lawlessness. A representative of a local "big man" approaches the manager one day and requests a "donation" to assist the big man in providing housing for the underprivileged. The envoy informs the manager that the large man will ensure that the manager has a productive stay in his country in exchange for the donation. There are no threats, but the manager is well aware that the huge man is the leader of a criminal organisation involved in drug trafficking. He also understands that the large man does actually support the underprivileged in his birthplace's decrepit neighbourhood. What exactly should the MANAGER doarrow_forwardThis case discusses the collapse of Britain’s last remaining major car manufacturer MG Rover in2005, and the subsequent loss of 6,500 jobs in the former industrial heartland of the West Midlands. The case traces the role played by the firm’s directors as well as overseas car companies in the Rover collapse and provides the opportunity to examine the nature of social responsibility and the relative responsibilities of governments and corporations for safeguarding employment. The name Longbridge stands for nearly a hundred years of British car manufacturing. The huge site near Birmingham in the West Midlands area has been the stage for many of the peaks and troughs of automotive history in the UK. Once the birthplace of the sporty, Austin Healey, the legendary Mini, and the practical Metro, the site has also been associated in the 1970s with industrial unrest and union militancy. More recently, the plant had started to become a virtual synonym for industrial downturn and decay, and the…arrow_forward
- Nevada passes a statute that any 18-wheel truck passing through Nevada must meet a Clean Fuel Fleet Exhaust Emission Standard of no more than 2.8 nitrous oxide (NOx). The federal statute requirement for such trucks is no more than 3.8 NOx. Carlton is driving his 18-wheeler cross-country to deliver a load and stops at a Nevada weigh station. The weigh station officer inspects Carlton’s documents, notes that Carlton’s truck has a 3.4 NOx emission level, and issues a citation. On what grounds might Carlton fight this citation?arrow_forwardThe Case of Baylor University Patty Crawford, the Title IX coordinator at Baylor from November 2014 to October 2016, was hired to coordinate the institution’s Title IX compliance when this case took place (Baylor University, n.d.). Like all Title IX coordinators, Crawford’s role was a comprehensive administrative role that bears the responsibility of ensuring that campuses prevent and respond to gender discrimination, including sexual misconduct. This role spans duties related to grievance process management, victim assistance, organization management, and climate management (Lake, 2017). In addition to managing the institution’s compliance, Title IX coordinators also craft comprehensive training and awareness strategies to ensure students, employees, and other campus stakeholders are aware of how to identify and report sexual misconduct and what resources are available to students regardless of whether they choose to proceed with the grievance process. Crawford alleged that she was…arrow_forwardDoing Business Internationally. Macrotech, Inc.,develops an innovative computer chip and obtains a patent onit. The firm markets the chip under the trademarked brandname “Flash.” Macrotech wants to sell the chip to Nitron,Ltd., in Pacifica, a foreign country. Macrotech is concerned,however, that after an initial purchase, Nitron will duplicate the chip, pirate it, and sell the pirated version to computermanufacturers in Pacifica. To avoid this possibility, Macrotech could establish its own manufacturing facility in Pacifica, but it does not want to do this. How can Macrotech,without establishing a manufacturing facility in Pacifica, protect Flash from being pirated by Nitron? (See Doing BusinessInternationally.)arrow_forward
- After OSHA was created, it began a process of and future policy in an area authorized by the law. which involves issuing statements to clarify currentarrow_forwardThe Trademarks Act 1999, protects well-known trademarks in two ways – an action against registration of similar marks and action against misuse of well-known marks. Management at SoftDev is looking to trademark their company logo. Discuss with management the concept of trademark law in South Africa and elaborate further on the limitations of a trademark law (discuss AT LEAST THREE (3) limitations)arrow_forward"7. Freedom of Speech. Wandering Dago, Inc. (WD), operates a food truck in Albany, New York. WD brands itself and the food it sells with language generally viewed as ethnic slurs. Owners Andrea Loguidice and Brandon Snooks, however, view the branding as giving a “nod to their Italian heritage” and “weakening the derogatory force of the slur.” Twice, WD applied to participate as a vendor in a summer lunch program in a state-owned plaza. Both times, the New York State Office of General Services (OGS) denied the appli-cation because of WD’s branding. WD filed a suit in a federal district court against RoAnn Destito, the commissioner of OGS, contending that the agency had violated WD’s right to free speech. What principles apply to the government’s regula-tion of the content of speech? How do those principles apply in WD’s case? Explain. [Wandering Dago, Inc. v. Destito, 879 F.3d 20 (2d Cir. 2018)] (See Business and the Bill of Rights.)"arrow_forward
- A Greek yogurt maker owns and operates a production facility in Switzerland. Within the next six months, the Swiss government has stipulated that all local food producers must list the genetically modified ingredients (GMO) contained in the product on its packaging label. GMO foods or, as critics commonly call them, "Franken-foods," in honor of Frankenstein, use genetic material that have been altered using genetic engineering techniques in making the food. Companies are often reluctant to post this information, fearful that it might result in people choosing not to use their products. Although labeling of GMO products in the marketplace is required in 64 countries, many others, including Greece, do not impose this regulation. Interestingly, reporting this information on the label is not required in the United States and no distinction between marketing GMO and non-GMO foods are presently recognized by the United States’ Food and Drug Administration. Dealing with growing demand for…arrow_forwardWisconsin passes a state law that bans all semi-trucks from carrying double-trailers on roads in our state (see picture below). The state's ostensible reason for passing the law is to reduce accidents on the road. Double-trailers a more likely to be involved in accidents than single-trailer semis. A national trade group representing freight companies sues the state, arguing that the law violates the Dormant Commerce Clause. Would the state law violate the Dormant Commerce Clause? Explain your decision.arrow_forwardDescribe the constitution of Canada's division of powers and how it relates to environmental legislation. Describe the sources and boundaries of each level of government's jurisdiction and authority with regard to environmental law (Canada).arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios