PLEASE SHOW COMPLETE SOLUTION, NO EXCEL. Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given next. TheMARR is 20% per year. At the conclusion of the useful life, the investment will be soldAB$28,000$55,000$40,000CapitalInvestmentAnnualExpenses15,00013,00022,000Annual23,00028,00032,000RevenuesMV at EOY 106,0008,00010,00010 yearsUseful life10 years10 yearsUse incremental analysis to determine the best alternative on the basis of PW method & IRR method.

Business decision-making techniques use incremental analysis to assess the true costs of various…

Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given next. The MARR is 20% per year. At the conclusion of the useful life, the investment will be sold C $40,000 Capital Investment $28,000 $55,000 Annual Expenses Annual 15,000 13,000 22,000 23,000 28,000 32,000 Revenues MV at EΟΥ 10 Useful life 6,000 10 years 8,000 10 years 10,000 10 years Use incremental analysis to determine the best alternative on the basis of PW method & IRR method.

Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given next. The MARR is 20% per year. At the conclusion of the useful life, the investment will be sold C $40,000 Capital Investment $28,000 $55,000 Annual Expenses Annual 15,000 13,000 22,000 23,000 28,000 32,000 Revenues MV at EΟΥ 10 Useful life 6,000 10 years 8,000 10 years 10,000 10 years Use incremental analysis to determine the best alternative on the basis of PW method & IRR method.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Complete the following analysis of cost alternatives and select the preferred alternative. The s A D Сapital investment $15,000 S16,000 $13,000 $18,000 Annual costs Market value 250 300 500 100 1,000 1,300 1,750 2,000 at EOY 10 FW(12%) -$49,975 –$53,658 ??? –$55,660 tudy period is 10 years and the MARR = 12% per %3D year.
Consider two air-conditioning systems with the cash flow estimates as given below. Use AW analysis to determine the sensitivity of the economic decision to MARR values of 4%, 6%, and 8% per year. Air-Conditioning System 1 System First cost, $ AOC. $ per year Salvage valué, $ New compressor and motor cost at midlife, $ Life, years -9,000 -850 -100 Proy -2,200 8 The annual worth of air-conditioning system 1 when the MARR is 4% is $ The annual worth of air-conditioning system 2 when the MARR is 4% is $ The annual worth of air-conditioning system 1 when the MARR is 6% is $ The annual worth of air-conditioning system 2 when the MARR is 6% is $ 10 www Air-Conditioning System 2 -13,000 -105 -300 -3,140 12
A project is being planned that has an initial investment at time 0, annual revenuesand expenses, and a salvage value at the end of the project lifespan (20 years). The financialvalues are summarized below:Initial investment amount at time 0 $150,000Estimated annual revenue $34,500 per yearEstimated annual expenses $8,700 per yearEstimated salvage value at end of lifespan $10,000Minimum attractive rate of return (MARR) 15%a. Calculate the capital recovery amount CR(i%).b. Using the annual worth (AW) method, determine whether purchasing the equipmentis economically justified.c. Repeat part (a) using the internal rate of return (IRR) method based on annual worth(AW).d. Using the present worth (PW) method, determine the break-even time period afterwhich purchase of the equipment generates a profit. (Find N when PW = 0) year period.
Referring to the following cumulative cash flow diagram, salvage value is most nearly 3M 10 ERY -IM $500000 $1M $750000 - s'NOILIGOd HSV)
Given the following two alternatives and using the repeatability assumption and MARR=15%/year, the equation for computing the present worth of vendor B is Vendor A First Cost, $ -15,000 Annual cost, $ per year -3500 Salvage Value, $ 1000 Life, years 3 Vendor B -18000 -3100 2000 4 OPW=18000-18000(P/F,15%, 4)-18000(P/F,15%, 8)+2000(P/F, 15%, 4)+2000(P/F, 15%, 8) +2000 (P/F, 15%, 12)-3100(P/A, 15%, 12) PW=18000-18000(P/F, 15%, 12)+2000(P/F, 15%, 4)+2000 (P/F, 15%, 8)+2000(P/F, 15%, 12)-3100(P/A, 15%, 12) O PW=-18000-18000(P/F,15%, 4) - 18000(P/F,15%, 8) +2000(P/F, 15%, 4)+2000(P/F, 15%, 8) +2000 (P/F, 15%, 12)-3100(P/A, 15%, 12) O PW=-18000(P/F,15%, 4) -18000(P/F,15%, 8) +2000(P/F, 15%, 4)+2000(P/F, 15%, 8) +2000(P/F, 15%, 12)-3100(P/A, 15%, 12)
7. A building cost P10,000,000 and the salvage value is P150,000 after 25 years The annual maintenance cost is P60,000 costs of repair is P200,000 every 5 years. Find the capitalized cost if money worth 15% per annum?
A Cost $4000 $2000 $6000 $1000 $9000 Annual benefit 639 410 761 117 750 Useful life, in years 20 20 20 20 20 i* 15% 20% 11.1% 9.9% 5.45% Perform incremental ROR analysis to select best one. MARR=6%; (P/A, 6%, 20) = 11.47 %3D
Brand A B 5:21 PM C D 2 years 3 years $13 4 years $17 5 years Which brand should the engineer select if the MARR is 9% a year? Cost m October 7, 2023 17:17 $7 2. An electrical engineer has to choose one brand of light bulbs among four available brands. The following information are available; lifetime $9 VPN G 4G+ LTE 22 8 0
Given the following pertinent data for four alternatives, what is the best alternative using the incremental ROR method given MARR=10% Initial Cost Annual CF, $ Life, years 30 O Alt. A Alt. B O Alt. C A O Alt. D B +22,000 +35,000 с -200,000 -275,000 -190,000 -331,350 30 D +19500 +42,000 30 30
The Gigadigit Manufacturing Inc. is considering to produce a new product. The following data have been provided to management: Sales price S17.50/unit Equipment cost S250,000 Incremental overhead cost |550,000/year Sales and marketing cost $150,000/year Operating and maintenance cost $25/operating hour Production time/1,000 units 100 hours Packaging and shipping cost s0.50/unit Planning horizon Minimum attractive rate of return 15% 5 years The managers would like to know the viability of this product and how it would roll out in sales. (a) To give them basis and insight what is the break-even value of units that must be sold annually to keep the product viable? (b) If the target revenue is from 30,000 units sold, what is the expected profit? (C) If the profit drops by 13% due to equipment replacement, how much must have been the cost of the alternative equipment? (d) Provide graph for (a)
The cash flows for three mutually exclusive alternatives are given in table below. MARR = 4%. ALB Alt. C 27,000 24,000 7,600 6,500 13% 11% Initial cost Annual benefits ROR Life in years Alt. A $15,000 $4,500 15% 5 Reference: Case Study 8 The best alternative for a MARR of 2.0% using the incremental rate of return analysis is A. Alt. C B. Alt. B C. Alt. A OD.Do-nothing
An electronics firm is planning to manufacture a new handheld gaming device for the preteen market. The data have been estimated for the product. Assuming a negligible market (salvage) value for the equipment at the end of five years, determine the breakeven annual sales volume for this product.