Figure 1.6 In the example below, the scientific method is used to solve an everyday problem. Order the scientific method steps (numbered items) with the process of solving the everyday problem (lettered items). Based on the results of the experiment, is the hypothesis correct? If it is incorrect, propose some alternative hypotheses.
- Observation
- Question
- Hypothesis (answer)
- Prediction
- Experiment
- Result
- There is something wrong with the electrical outlet.
To write:
The given hypothesis is based on the observation and tries to solve the problem that comes in daily life.
Introduction:
The scientific test allows us to determine the occurrence of any phenomenon occurring in nature as well as our day to day life. The scientific experimentation needs a hypothesis to test, which can be correct or incorrect. The test of the results determines whether the proposed hypothesis can be accepted or not.
Explanation of Solution
Observation: The observation is the visible or observable record, which is the outcome of the tests performed. Hence, the observation would be that my toaster does not toast my bread and my coffee maker does not work. Hence, the sentences (c) and (e) are the observations.
Question: The question is something, which is asked, in order to find a solution. In this case, the question would be why doesn’t my toaster work? Hence, the sentence (f) is the question.
Hypothesis (answer): Hypothesis is the predicted result, which is testable. The hypothesis, in this case, is there is something wrong with the electrical outlet. Hence, the sentence (a) is the hypothesis.
Prediction: The prediction is an assumption made in order to perform the experiment related to the hypothesis. In this case, the prediction can be If the outlet is not working properly, my coffee maker won’t work when plugged in. Hence, the sentence (b) is the prediction.
Experiment: The experiment is the test performed by the person to test the hypothesis. In this case, the experiment is plugging in the coffee maker to test if the outlet is working or not. Hence, the sentence (d) is the experiment.
Result: The result is the outcome of the experiment. In this case, the coffee maker works are the result. Hence, the sentence (e) is the experiment.
As the hypothesis about the electrical output is not working is incorrect and it is proved by testing the coffee machine, hence, this hypothesis cannot be accepted. The possible hypothesis can be that there is something wrong with the toaster.
The hypothesis given by the person about the electrical output is incorrect. Hence, it cannot be accepted. The person thinks that the toaster is not working due to the problem with electrical output, it is proven to be incorrect by testing the coffee machine. Hence, another hypothesis, which suggests some problem with the toaster can be correct.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 1 Solutions
Biology 2e
Additional Science Textbook Solutions
College Physics
Biology: Life on Earth (11th Edition)
Biology: Life on Earth with Physiology (11th Edition)
Microbiology with Diseases by Body System (5th Edition)
Concepts of Genetics (12th Edition)
Microbiology: An Introduction (13th Edition)
- Which of the following is not a feature of a scientific theory? a. It begins as a hypothesis. b. It eventually is accepted as absolute truth. c. It requires critical thinking. d. It is not accepted as a theory until it has been tested repeatedly.arrow_forwardA related set of hypotheses that collectively explain some aspect of the natural world makes up a scientific _________. a. prediction b. test c. theory d. authority e. observationarrow_forwardThe type of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion is called_______. a. deductive reasoning b. the scientific method c. hypothesis-based science d. inductive reasoningarrow_forward
- A person notices that her houseplants that are regularly exposed to music seem to grow more quickly than those in rooms with no music. As a result, she determines that plants grow better when exposed to music. This example most closely resembles which type of reasoning? inductive reasoning deductive reasoning neither, because no hypothesis was made both inductive and deductive reasoningarrow_forwardWhich of the following definitions are consistent with the scientific meaning/use of the word theory? Check all that apply A proposed explanation for a natural phenomenon that is based on general principles A guess for why a particular scientific observation was made A description for natural phenomena that is based on a group of scientists' ideas, not knowledge or evidence. A collection of related concepts that are supported by evidence and explain observed facts for a natural phenomenon. A description of a natural phenomenon that scientists are uncertain about, but like the sound of.arrow_forwardThe scientific method is the process that scientists use to find out new information. It involves a question, a hypothesis, a prediction, collecting data, and analyzing that data to make a conclusion. How would you use the scientific method to answer this question: Do mice live longer when they are fed high-sugar diets?arrow_forward
- Taylor deiced to start her own a piggery in their province. She wanted to know what should be the best food for the pigs to become heavier. She considered natural foods or synthetic foods. Utilize the scientific method to solve the problem of Taylor. Problem: Questions : Hypothesis: Steps in the Experiment: Present and Analyze the Data (tabular form): Draw conclusion:arrow_forwardWhich of the following is not true of science?a. Science is based on the premise that all events can be traced to natural causes.b. Important science can be based on chance observations.c. A hypothesis is basically a wild guess.d. Scientific theories can potentially be disproved.arrow_forward______________, in a scientific experiment, must always be held constant. Question 10 options: Control variables Interdependent variables Hypotheses None of the other answers are correct. Dependent variables Independent variablesarrow_forward
- What did Thomas Kuhn propose? What observations were responsible for his proposal for how scienceworks? Where did he get his ideas? -philosophy of sciencearrow_forwardWhich of the following descriptions best describes the meaning of a scientific theory and a scientific law? A theory is an explanation for a process that hasn't yet been confirmed while a law is an explanation that has been actually confirmed. A scientific theory attempts to explain why a process is happening while a scientific law attempts to describe how this process happens, which can often be represented by a mathematical equation. A scientific theory describes an explanation for a process that could still be changed as new information becomes available while a scientific law is settled and can never be changed. A scientific law is more valid and more accepted in science than a scientific theory. A scientific theory describes all the experiments that a scientist would like to perform in a lab while a scientific law describes the experiments that are legal for that scientist to perform in a lab.arrow_forwardWhich of the following statements best distinguisheshypotheses from theories in science?(A) Theories are hypotheses that have been proved.(B) Hypotheses are guesses; theories are correct answers.(C) Hypotheses usually are relatively narrow in scope; theorieshave broad explanatory power.(D) Theories are proved true; hypotheses are often contradictedby experimental results.arrow_forward
- Biology 2eBiologyISBN:9781947172517Author:Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann ClarkPublisher:OpenStaxHuman Biology (MindTap Course List)BiologyISBN:9781305112100Author:Cecie Starr, Beverly McMillanPublisher:Cengage LearningConcepts of BiologyBiologyISBN:9781938168116Author:Samantha Fowler, Rebecca Roush, James WisePublisher:OpenStax College