Check the statement: Hospital admission rate has dropped in the past two decades is true or false.
Explanation of Solution
It is true that the hospital admission rate has dropped in the past two decades. This is due to the increase in the US population. The US population faces an increase from 230 million (1981) to above 320 million in 2016. Also, the middle age for the people rises from 30 to 37 from 1981 to 2016. The annual number of admissions to the US hospital can be illustrated as follows:
According to the data, it shows a decline tendency in the hospitalization after the implementation of Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGs). The annual number of admissions to U.S hospital on 2011 is nearly 35 million and going onward the number of hospital admission shows a decline and below 35 million.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
- Indicate whether the statement is true or false, and justify your answer.The number of US medical schools decreased drastically between 1900 and 1950.arrow_forwardIndicate whether each statement is true or false, and justify your answer.The Dartmouth Atlas results are proof that health is easier and/or cheaper to produce in some American cities than others.arrow_forwardIndicate whether the statement is true or false, and justify your answer.The thrifty phenotype hypothesis states that early-life events after birth have a strong influence on health status even in adulthood.arrow_forward
- Indicate whether each statement is true or false, and justify your answer.There are no out-of-pocket costs (i.e. coinsurance, copayments, premiums, deductibles, etc.) for patients being treated by health providers in the UK, at least for most types of care.arrow_forward1. True or False (Justify your answer briefly) (a) Potential outcomes are never observed. (b) Let Y0i and Y1i be the two potential outcomes from a binary treatment. The causal effect of the treatment on the outcome for observation i is Y1i − Y0i. (c) If we assume the individual treatment effect τi = Y1i − Y0i is the same across i, then τi can be estimated. (d) Random assignment is the same as random sampling. (e) Sampling bias is the same as selection bias. (f) If treatment is randomly assigned, then treatment is independent of the outcome.arrow_forwardIndicate whether the statement is true or false, and justify your answer. 1. In some markets, adverse selection develops over time as customers learn about their own risk levels. 2. The fact that high-risk individuals are usually less risk-averse than low-risk individuals helps counteract adverse selection.arrow_forward
- Indicate whether the statement is true or false, and justify your answer.Many countries in the world have experienced increases in the number of obese individuals in their population, but only the US has seen increases in childhood obesity.arrow_forwardIndicate whether the statement is true or false, and justify your answer.The take-up rate of health insurance among people with good jobs (that is full-time jobs that have lasted longer than a year) has declined in recent years, and this is an important reason for the increase in uninsurance rates over those same years.arrow_forwardIndicate whether the statement is true or false, and justify your answer.A primary cause of increasing uninsurance in the US over the past decade is that more employers are deciding to stop providing health insurance coverage entirely.arrow_forward
- Indicate whether the statement is true or false, and justify your answer.To date, no major health insurance experiment has studied the impact of uninsurance, just different levels of insurance.arrow_forwardIndicate whether the statement is true, false, or unclear, and justify your answer.Although a firm prediction of Akerlof’s model, the adverse selection death spiral has never been observed in practice.arrow_forwardOne major premise of the Rothschild–Stiglitz model is that there is a perfectly competitive market for health insurance. Suppose instead that the market is not perfectly competitive, and in fact competitor firms have a hard time entering the market. Could a pooling equilibrium occur in this case? What is it about competition that prevents pooling in the Rothschild–Stiglitz model? No formal proof is necessary, but do make your reasoning clear. Evaluate the following statement: competition in health insurance markets is harmful.arrow_forward