Ch 3 Questions Whenever possible use concrete examples not found in the book. 1. Explain in detail the two reasons why people often refuse to believe their own eyes in the Asch experiment. Naturally, human beings are herd animals. Human nature is to go with the rest of the ‘herd’ and give into peer pressure. This is the first reason why people often refuse to believe what they are seeing in the Asch experiment. People will often simply go along with the group, even if it is going directly against their own judgment. For example, you are drinking at a party only because it is what everyone else is doing. The second reason has to do with the information. If many people think or do something, their actions and thoughts convey what is the correct information for you to have. An example that has happened to me, is when I change my answer in class because I got a different answer than everyone else. 2. Explain how government propaganda can be an effective nudge. Often people have a strong distrust of bureaucrats and will be hesitant to listen to them. If the government were to have someone like Lebron James talk about the negative sides of marijuana, it would have a much greater effect than if a politician were to give the same speech. James is not a bureaucrat, and therefore people are more likely to listen to …show more content…
Due to this, they will go along with it. It is also described as “no one believes, but everyone thinks everyone believes”. Everyone is thinking that the majority of people in the group agree with the norm. If everyone has this mindset then nobody will speak up, as they are afraid of being the minority. For example, a child is being bullied, but nobody watching does anything. Since no one else is speaking out, you think that everyone else must agree with the bullying. Because of this, you won't speak
Asch initiated his experiment by making one of the particpants at ease. He asked a serious of elementary questions where the four
First, the experiment Solomon Asch began in 1955 gives an example how social influence can sway or perception of reality. The results are an example of normative social influence and informational social influence. Additionally, the participants exhibit the need to gain a person’s approval, and was willing to accept others opinions about reality. Consequently, a persons moral sense
Persuasion is the key to getting the results you want, not only for politicians or lawyers, but for every one of us. In a job interview, you will have to persuade your interviewers why they should hire you over the other candidates. In a classroom presentation you will have to convince your classmates and teacher that what you're saying is worth listening to and that you deserve a good grade on the assignment.
Asch’s experiment was performed in 1951 and is now a classic experiment in psychology. Asch asked individuals a simple question and a high percentage answered correctly. Then Asch placed a participant in a room with seven actors who had predetermined incorrect answers. When asked in front of the group, 75% of people would give incorrect answers clearly because of they conformed to the actors around them. Asch then concluded that it is natural for one to conform to society in order to fit
Asch got 123 student volunteers to participate in wat they thought was a vision test but was actually an experiment on conformity. All but one of the participants in each group was really a confederate and the real purpose of the experiment was to see how the acual participant would react to the behaviour of the confederates.
On average, about thirty-two percent of the participants conformed to pick the blatantly wrong answer and over the twelve trials seventy-five percent of the students conformed at least once, and twenty-five didn’t conform at all. Many of the participants afterward admitted they conformed to give the wrong answer because they wanted to avoid being ridiculed and some thought the group really was correct. Is was the results of this experiment that led Asch to conclude that whenever people conform it’s to either fit in or because they believe that since they’re in the minority their conclusion is incorrect. Another influential experiment concerning conformity is the Stanford Prison Experiment. Conducted in 1973, Phillip Zimbardo wanted to determine if brutality in prison systems was due to the
Solomon Asch set up a laboratory experiment using deception and confederates to determine what factors were involved in conformity and individual decisions in group decisions. Asch instructed subjects to choose which of three lines was the same length as the original line shown. Each subject was on a panel with seven other subjects, however in reality were confederates. The experimenter demonstrated the two cards and asked the individuals to choose the line on the comparison card that is the same length as the standard line. In the second trial the process was repeated again. However, on the third trial, when the card is revealed everyone gave wrong answers. The results indicate that approximately 75% of the subjects went with the group’s
The aim of Asch was to test if someone would conform to a group of people even if they knew the group was wrong. This was a laboratory experiment which involved 6-9 male students of which one was naïve and the rest confederates. These confederates were instructed to contribute incorrect answers on certain tasks. The task involved judging the length of lines meaning the answer was blatantly obvious. However as the confederates were deliberately giving the wrong answers, this was to test if it resulted in the naïve participant questioning their own answers. Asch’s experiment found that when the participants were alone they very rarely gave wrong answers as there was no pressure to conform, however, 25% of participants conformed on most tasks/questions when they became part of a group. Astonishingly, 75% of individuals conformed at least once within this experiment. In conclusion, Asch found that participants conformed so they would not be embarrassed or stand out3 even if they had known the correct
Solomon Asch 's (1951) conformity experiment is the study of people adapting their behaviours in order to follow the social normalities. This experiment entails a group of people who are actors and know about the experiment, and one person who is unknowing of the experiment, which are all in the same room. The group is shown a pair of cards; card A has a line on the card, and card B has three lines varying in length on the card, the similarities of the lines are obvious. The group individually, saying out loud picks one of the three lines on card B that matches the length of the line on card A. Everybody picks the correct line, this happens for a few rounds, then when shown another pair of cards the first actor chooses the wrong line on card B. The rest of the actors choose the same line the first actor chose, this tests to see if the unknowing participant will choose the same answer as the group (McLeod, 2008). The person who is unknowing of the
The ASCH experiment demonstrated that humans conform easily, and it is scary to know that. Humans do not want to feel left out or alone. In groups or large numbers of people, we
Asch’s experiment was designed to study the cause and extent to which an individual will conform within a given group setting. Using the inductive experimental method Asch observed the group in a controlled setting where he was able to manipulate the independent variable (the amount of group pressure) to observe the effects of the dependent variable (the conformity of the participant). The purpose of his experiment was to understand which aspect of the influence of a majority is more influential—the size of the majority or its unanimity (how much they agree vs. the individual)? This brings upon the subject two opposed forces: the evidence of their senses and the unanimous opinion of a majority group. To do this the subjects had to declare
This allowed Asch to observe how the choices of the subject differed when placed under peer pressure. The results showed that 75% of the subjects chose the incorrect answer on at least one question although some of the data may be off because of experimental error. Although the experiment may have seemed successful, many people criticize the way it was performed. Some argue that the participant types may have made the data unreliable. The study was composed of mainly young males who were very impressionable to the others thoughts.
I like the example that you make about your decision for no withdrawing your astronomy class that was an excellent decision and a good example of Central route persuasion because the student who you talk to and the professor were able to make you think and change your mind in a positive way.
I, How many of you have been hearing about bullying? As you may hear on TVs or news or people are talking about the rates of bullying is going up from years to years.
Solomon Asch was a psychologist that conduced numerous expirments designed to illustrate the increasing conformity within social groups. The experiments also invesigated the effect the number of people present within the group had one the conformity rate. Asch hypothesized, “ that the majority of the people would not conform to something obviosly wrong; however, when surrounded by (other) individuals all voicing an incorrect answer, 75% of them(the participant) will conform to the groups answer” (Watzlawick 1976)