Cultural Relativism Essay

In his essay “Who’s to Judge?” by Louis Pojman, he links ethnocentrism to relativism as “an uncritical belief in the inherent superiority of one’s own culture”, and states that “what is good in our culture could be wrong in another.” He also raises a point against moral relativism. In this paper I will summarize the arguments and thoughts provoking Pojman to take his position in this examination of “who’s to judge what is right or wrong?” The author explains the “Diversity Thesis” as “simply anthropological

and ethical relativism. Both of these ethical theories attempt to answer the question of what it means for something to be right and wrong. Are some actions innately right and wrong, or are they relative to specific cultural, religious, or individual beliefs? Can it actually be said that some actions are really independently right and wrong, or do we just think they are because of long-held relativistic beliefs? By the same token, are morals really relative,

The philosophy of ethics attempts to answer or address issues of morality and determine whether something is right or wrong, and why. Moral relativism is one of many ethics positions that essentially recognizes that people have disagreeing moral beliefs and therefore, one must be tolerant of other people’s morals. This stance leads to the problematic realization that if this is true, there can be no objective moral truths or universal principles. Additionally, the moral theory of ethical egoism refers

Over the course of this week we have been exploring the ideas of cultural relativism and Subjectivism. As it was first being introduced in class with a lecture and conversation both subjectivism and cultural relativism for the most part seemed like a really progressive way of judging if someone’s moral decisions were right or wrong. Cultural relativism and subjectivism were ample ways of stopping judgment and criticisms of people’s opinions on what is ethically right for their people and the ones

Ani Martirosyan Philosophy 305 Business Ethics Assignment #4 Chapter 8: Relativism, Multiculturalism, And Universal Norms: Their Role in Business Ethics The central thesis of Beauchamp’s argument is as follows: I argue that although a relativism of all moral standards is an untenable position, a lower-level relativism of moral judgment and multiculturalism are morally warranted. I conclude that there is a universal common morality, but that it allows for moral disagreement and legitimate differences

Macionis defines ethnocentrism as “The practice of judging another culture by the standards of one’s own culture”. An example of this is the way some Americans criticize traditional Middle Eastern veils as being oppressive to the women who wear them. In American culture, clothing is valued as a way to express yourself and wearing revealing clothing is generally accepted as a way to show off sex appeal. When Americans see a woman walking down the street wearing a burka, hijab, or niqab they might

for relativism and tolerance; when

commitments allow. Therefore, equally an action is wrong/immoral if that person disapproves or their commitments forbid it. The reasons to accept ethical relativism are as follows. Firstly, there is the diversity of moral views. Disagreement in moral beliefs existence is evidences that there are no universal truths, only subjective

universe. Many different concepts such as relativism attempt to disprove truth that philosophy attempts to pursue. To understand what it means for philosophy to pursue truth, we must first understand the nature of philosophy, or what philosophy really is. To understand the nature of philosophy, we must look at the six chief characteristics of philosophy. The six chief characteristics of philosophy will help us understand why other concepts such as relativism are wrong, and why philosophy does indeed

Moral Subjectivism: Moral Subjectivism: ethical philosophical theory comes In several shapes, its most individualistic expression is ethical subjectivism, ethical subjectivism says that the standards for what is thought - concerning virtuously right or wrong is the people perceptions, opinions, experiences, inclinations, and their needs. Ethical subjectivism denies the existence of absolute, unchanging, universal moral standards. Instead, it views ethical values as being private, individual